Jump to content

c4 l2off rates x?  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. c4 l2off rates x?

    • x70
      52
    • x150
      14
    • x500
      32


Recommended Posts

Posted

Make C5 Client with C4 Stats / skills

 

I want a server with fast Sleep (sleep spam) C3 - and C4 had the best pvp, but C5 Client is nice with 3 bars/better UI

 

Not much difference from C4 to C5.... so should be easy to change C4 into C5 client.

 

 

 

Posted

Make C5, and mid rate (30)

I think that all want and need a balanced mid rate server. There are many high rate servers...but High rate will never be balanced ! :P

Posted

Make C5, and mid rate (30)

I think that all want and need a balanced mid rate server. There are many high rate servers...but High rate will never be balanced ! :P

Posted

Make C5, and mid rate (30)

I think that all want and need a balanced mid rate server. There are many high rate servers...but High rate will never be balanced ! :P

First posts and make spam ;P

Posted

Make C5 Client with C4 Stats / skills

 

I want a server with fast Sleep (sleep spam) C3 - and C4 had the best pvp, but C5 Client is nice with 3 bars/better UI

 

Not much difference from C4 to C5.... so should be easy to change C4 into C5 client.

 

Its not easy...at all lol.

 

 

 

 

Posted

why c5 ?! when c6 is more popular and better .

 

How is C6 better?

 

Lineage 2 should of ended at C4, really the amount of buffs needs to be cut back, there is no need to have somany buffs it ruins the game.

Lineage 2 nowadays is all about buffing and not about pvp anymore.

 

 

I know to convert C5 to C4 would be a bit of a bitch you would have to re work every single packet -_-... and there are not that many C5 files compiled together.

 

But I still think C3 was the best chronicle, and C5 made the game better by introducing better UI (3 bars etc...)

 

 

It would be nice to have a freya server with Spells/Stats/Skills/Buffs from c3 / c5 / C4 sleep (spam sleep moves)

 

C3 and C4 where more fast pace L2 pvp.

 

C6 is slow/grind/farm/buff/ bla bla bla over and over there are somany C6 servers and they all fail hard... look at L2 Silent brand new server and its complete trash, its an embarrassment to L2, yet with vote spam its "top 5" lol what garbage.

 

 

The people who play Lineage 2 nowadays, know nothing about the game anymore all the old community is dead/moved on.

 

GG RIP Lineage.

 

 

Posted

How is C6 better?

 

Lineage 2 should of ended at C4, really the amount of buffs needs to be cut back, there is no need to have somany buffs it ruins the game.

Lineage 2 nowadays is all about buffing and not about pvp anymore.

 

 

I know to convert C5 to C4 would be a bit of a bitch you would have to re work every single packet -_-... and there are not that many C5 files compiled together.

 

But I still think C3 was the best chronicle, and C5 made the game better by introducing better UI (3 bars etc...)

 

 

It would be nice to have a freya server with Spells/Stats/Skills/Buffs from c3 / c5 / C4 sleep (spam sleep moves)

 

C3 and C4 where more fast pace L2 pvp.

 

C6 is slow/grind/farm/buff/ bla bla bla over and over there are somany C6 servers and they all fail hard... look at L2 Silent brand new server and its complete trash, its an embarrassment to L2, yet with vote spam its "top 5" lol what garbage.

 

 

The people who play Lineage 2 nowadays, know nothing about the game anymore all the old community is dead/moved on.

 

GG RIP Lineage.

 

 

I find IL better too

Posted

But I still think C3 was the best chronicle

 

if you had not played c3 in global, you had not played c3 at all

cause c3 privates were c1 with c3 skills :)

Posted
The people who play Lineage 2 nowadays, know nothing about the game anymore all the old community is dead/moved on.

 

GG RIP Lineage.

 

That is true...partially. But it is amazing just how many old-school players will and are coming back to the game when they are offered something "real". There are still thousands willing, wanting, and ready to play they just needed the right server ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..