Jump to content

What do you prefer?  

96 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you prefer?

    • C4 1+1
      59
    • Epilogue
      37


Recommended Posts

Posted

For me EP is better than C4 Old times are good but Technology,Game Client's must be updating and improving

 

java language is the same for the last many years. so "technology" has not advanced at all

if both clients are official, then there i nothing to compare either as far as execution is concerned.

Posted

Why c4??? The best cronicle for my and a lot of my friends is c6 ;] I suggest to thing about c6 :P

the poll is about c4 and EP.. not about IL.

It doesn't matter if u like IL but what do u think is better between c4 and EP?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

c4 is best at gameplay , but gracia is best ar grafics ... so i'd ratter have a nice game  ;)

 

"c4 is best at gameplay" Right but what do u think about performance ? Epilogue is best for future we and can't stop it.

 

Epilogue is best my opinion.

 

All those are like Windows Xp and Windows 7.

Posted

"c4 is best at gameplay" Right but what do u think about performance ? Epilogue is best for future we and can't stop it.

 

Epilogue is best my opinion.

 

All those are like Windows Xp and Windows 7.

the future is just a WoW transformed into L2 graphic.

 

A LOT, and when i say this i mean A LOT of WoW features are now in L2,

some are identical, some are a bit changed, some are only the ideas, but still they are WoW features,

its kinda nice, since L2 > WoW most in graphic, like this they bring more ppl to play L2, and to be more exact, the 80% of the players, that actually play a game without care that its WoW or L2, or w/e, they play a game for its features.

 

but i still wait the massive change, in the L2 goddess of destruction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..