Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For God's Sake.

 

drdance, discokilla, zeronc,kotty,yorgoc, you guys don't have 50 posts.

Stop that bullshit. There is even one with 1 post!

 

Reported all...

 

BTW, it still works in some IL Roxy, Ascalon, Myths.

Posted

For God's Sake.

 

drdance, discokilla, zeronc,kotty,yorgoc, you guys don't have 50 posts.

Stop that bullshit. There is even one with 1 post!

 

Reported all...

 

BTW, it still works in some IL Roxy, Ascalon, Myths.

 

If it works in servers like roxy u dont need to mention it 'cos almost nothing works there & the gm's/devs are extra pro >_>

 

Posted

/offtopic i want to suggest to lock exploit/bug topics

reasons:only pure spamm (look here 14 pages pure spamm)

second no point to leave that topics open..no1 can do (or help)if the exploit/bug dont work

and if u look that posts is only spaaaammm with +1 gj nice w0w from guys with 1post

i dont know if u understand me but i hope u get the point....

 

/ontopic XAO i got scammed like with that trick/bug.no1 beleives that u give adena free but some ppls will believe that u leave server (like me ><)

 

sry for my eng

Posted

BTW This is VERY risky because in the interlude servers (private) that I played If I have items in the pet inventory and if by ANY chance I crash then when I relog I still have the pet in inventory but the pet's inventory is empty so all adena is lost rofl ..I got screwed once 'cos of this >_>

 

/offtopic

I request mods to lock this topic.

Reason: Spam

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..