Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, Everyone,..Today I created a Code and I want

to share it with you..

____________________________________________________

With this code Admin is able to Create items in

another character..

____________________________________________________

How it work?

You just press //create_item

Target the player you want to create an item

and put Item ID and Item Count..

____________________________________________________

I think that something same had L2J-Archid and this

is very usefull for some servers. If you want you

can use it as a Donation System.

Credits: Spidey*

____________________________________________________

Working 100% Tested at Interlude Client

Here is the Code..! Enjoy!

Index: java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/handler/admincommandhandlers/AdminCreateItem.java
===================================================================
--- java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/handler/admincommandhandlers/AdminCreateItem.java	(revision 331)
+++ java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/handler/admincommandhandlers/AdminCreateItem.java	(working copy)
@@ -24,11 +24,15 @@
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.datatables.ItemTable;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.ihandlers.IAdminCommandHandler;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.GMAudit;
+import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.L2Object;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.L2World;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.model.actor.instance.L2PcInstance;
+import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.network.SystemMessageId;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.network.serverpackets.ItemList;
+import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.network.serverpackets.SystemMessage;
import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.templates.L2Item;

+
/**
 * This class handles following admin commands:
 * - itemcreate = show menu
@@ -150,6 +154,20 @@

	private void createItem(L2PcInstance activeChar, int id, int num)
	{
+        // Player Target
+        L2Object target = activeChar.getTarget();
+        if (target == null) target = activeChar;
+        L2PcInstance player = null;
+        if (target instanceof L2PcInstance)
+        {
+            player = (L2PcInstance) target;
+        }
+        else
+        {
+            activeChar.sendPacket(new SystemMessage(SystemMessageId.INCORRECT_TARGET));
+            return;
+        }
+        
		if (num > 20)
		{
			L2Item template = ItemTable.getInstance().getTemplate(id);
@@ -160,12 +178,13 @@
			}
		}

-		activeChar.getInventory().addItem("Admin", id, num, activeChar, null);
+		player.getInventory().addItem("Admin", id, num, player, null);

-		ItemList il = new ItemList(activeChar, true);
-		activeChar.sendPacket(il);
+		ItemList il = new ItemList(player, true);
+		player.sendPacket(il);

-		activeChar.sendMessage("You have spawned " + num + " item(s) number " + id + " in your inventory.");
+		activeChar.sendMessage("You have spawned " + num + " item(s) number " + id + " in " + player.getName() + " 's inventory.");
+		player.sendMessage("Spidey* Spawned something to your Inventory.Check!");

	}
}

P.S: You can edit this:

player.sendMessage("Spidey* Spawned.... 

to your name, or leave it Admin!

Posted

show evidence

He hadnt..

He just say smthig for a More Post Count..

I created this code by using AdminEnchant for Help..

+        // Player Target
+        L2Object target = activeChar.getTarget();
+        if (target == null) target = activeChar;
+        L2PcInstance player = null;
+        if (target instanceof L2PcInstance)
+        {
+            player = (L2PcInstance) target;
+        }
+        else

For example this is from AdminEnchant

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..