Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

LoL... post count = more people posting useless stuff to own their posts. There is no enchant exploit/bug/trick. Its all random.

 

void Enchant()

{

int sucess;

sucess = RandomFrom(1, 100);

if (sucess > =40) // 60% sucess rate

printf("Sucessful enchant!");

else

printf("Enchant failed!");

}

 

cant be more simple than that!!

Posted

many apologies for the unbelievers. this is my technique that i wish to share. fake or not its for the user to decide. i post because it works for me not because i want to read others. afterall, this is a forum for "exploits" even though my subject isn't exactly relevant, its the closest that i can choose.

Posted

LoL... post count = more people posting useless stuff to own their posts. There is no enchant exploit/bug/trick. Its all random.

 

void Enchant()

{

int sucess;

sucess = RandomFrom(1, 100);

if (sucess > =40) // 60% sucess rate

printf("Sucessful enchant!");

else

printf("Enchant failed!");

}

 

cant be more simple than that!!

 

yes, that working like that.

but ur "RandomForm()" is not "random". u can't have simple random funcion. u need use some varible to create random numbers. u can use time, or something what is fast changing.

so it's not that simpe :p

Posted

Well this is basic c++ and l2 I know is made in visualc++ with unrealII engine so it might be that exact kind of random. We all knew that enchant is calculated like this but what I would like to know is how the function random is calculated *keep in mind this program was created in the `80 so it could be a rather simple and predictible function.

void Enchant()

{

int sucess;

sucess = RandomFrom(1, 100);

if (sucess > =40) // 60% sucess rate

printf("Sucessful enchant!");

else

printf("Enchant failed!");

}

 

cant be more simple than that!!

 

derf thanks for your share, working or not I made a +6, still I need more tries to be sure this is really working. Also you`re saing between 3 and 6 europe time the succes is higher, might be cause then the number of people on server is low so your enchanting way works better ;)

Posted

Even on the official lineage 2 page it even states the ent rate is 1 out of 3 chance of failing your weapon. But im sure this doesnt apply to private servers so lol we will never know unless the owner of the server told you the right % of ent rate.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I'm on that same situation, but hey after almost 3600 commits it's almost playable! 😛
    • Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types.   If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance.   Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent.
    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.   Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock