Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

god bless the idiots who buy something from you xD

 

just from curiosity...you dont know absolutely 0 about anything related to java and you sell packs thats a bit strange from my view since if i remember correct you spent days with fixing 1 damn npe while i gave you more fix so guess what you dont know shit and you make projects?ok you dont hurt anything with that since its fail soon but sell packs?thats another story...

 

PS.: the fact that you use the name of l2j-official dont make your shit working :D

 

i saw some fixes from u on dev-warez pack and guess what.. usless . anyway no flame in this, i dont know u and u dont know me. but still u demand money on my thread for smth maybe low as difficult for one as u and u was wrong, cuz the problem was not the one u said. so yeah not all ppl are pro. and if all stop from learning cuz there is somebody better then them, we still live in caves. so stop QQ-ing cuz u are 100 dev's here and there's no IL project done 100%.

Posted

i saw some fixes from u on dev-warez pack and guess what.. usless . anyway no flame in this, i dont know u and u dont know me. but still u demand money on my thread for smth maybe low as difficult for one as u and u was wrong, cuz the problem was not the one u said. so yeah not all ppl are pro. and if all stop from learning cuz there is somebody better then them, we still live in caves. so stop QQ-ing cuz u are 100 dev's here and there's no IL project done 100%.

 

you dont understand something :)

 

1.those were requested BECAUSE s said "i cant add it plix plox add it"

2.interlude = crap almost everybody knows this even the interlude maniacs thats why there are no 100% done pack

3.i dont need to care about if it was the problem what i said or no since all rev that i added was requested because s cant add it alone thats all

 

and by the way im not QQing what i do is beeing straight i never said said i demand money(idk where you read that)also i never said im better or im "pro" like a lot of you like to say so guess what you have no valid point :) as Grisom would say "your argument is invalid" :)

Posted

i saw some fixes from u on dev-warez pack and guess what.. usless . anyway no flame in this, i dont know u and u dont know me. but still u demand money on my thread for smth maybe low as difficult for one as u and u was wrong, cuz the problem was not the one u said. so yeah not all ppl are pro. and if all stop from learning cuz there is somebody better then them, we still live in caves. so stop QQ-ing cuz u are 100 dev's here and there's no IL project done 100%.

you dont understand something :)

 

1.those were requested BECAUSE s said "i cant add it plix plox add it"

2.interlude = crap almost everybody knows this even the interlude maniacs thats why there are no 100% done pack

3.i dont need to care about if it was the problem what i said or no since all rev that i added was requested because s cant add it alone thats all

 

and by the way im not QQing what i do is beeing straight i never said said i demand money(idk where you read that)also i never said im better or im "pro" like a lot of you like to say so guess what you have no valid point :) as Grisom would say "your argument is invalid" :)

1) I....... DONT......... CARE.

2) I....DONT...CARE

3) I..DONT..CARE

4)I DONT CARE

 

Is this enough ?

Posted

you dont understand something :)

 

1.those were requested BECAUSE s said "i cant add it plix plox add it"

2.interlude = crap almost everybody knows this even the interlude maniacs thats why there are no 100% done pack

3.i dont need to care about if it was the problem what i said or no since all rev that i added was requested because s cant add it alone thats all

valid ? they are, u done smth even if was demanded u done smth that didnt work. clear ?

 

 

and by the way im not QQing what i do is beeing straight i never said said i demand money(idk where you read that)also i never said im better or im "pro" like a lot of you like to say so guess what you have no valid point :) as Grisom would say "your argument is invalid" :)

no sh!t ?

or i can sell you an alredy reworked mmocore you need to have only the source code of the pack if you want this send me a pm

want quote from pm too ?

 

anyway u all work on gracia GL, see the next updates and GL again yeah maybe IL is crap why ? cuz u cant fix it.. if u cant fix IL with less of data, u can gracia ? cmon dont be..

Posted

valid ? they are, u done smth even if was demanded u done smth that didnt work. clear ?

 

no sh!t ?want quote from pm too ?

 

anyway u all work on gracia GL, see the next updates and GL again yeah maybe IL is crap why ? cuz u cant fix it.. if u cant fix IL with less of data, u can gracia ? cmon dont be..

MMOCore is already reworked in this pack. pfff

Everyone just be quiet. This project looks very promising to me. Keep working on it. Support them guys :)

Maybe.

Posted

valid ? they are, u done smth even if was demanded u done smth that didnt work. clear ?

 

no sh!t ?want quote from pm too ?

 

anyway u all work on gracia GL, see the next updates and GL again yeah maybe IL is crap why ? cuz u cant fix it.. if u cant fix IL with less of data, u can gracia ? cmon dont be..

 

if you dont understand anything about that kind of stuff its not my problem :) and btw IL is not crap because of we dont fix it...i played interlude on official from the pts until the end of the interlude and it was crap...dont come up short until you dont know what are you talking about, thanks :)

Posted

is crap maybe for u cuz u dont like it. and i dont need to "understand anything about that kind of stuff " to say ITS NOT WORKING, its clear that what u added didnt work and made the pack to sux more, even if all ppl from this world say ur the best dev, if i see clearly that thing dont work, u got no value for me (dont say u dont care about my opp, this is not the point).

speaking about "crap" gracia is better ? play a bit WoW , like 2 - 3 months and then tell me gracia own.

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..