Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, i seem to be having issues with H5 interfaces, no matter which one i install - if it includes interface.u file always get the SAME exact error. Tried with interfaces:

Deadz 1.8-2.4 (multiple versions)

Edkith

Peepoclown (thats the file name, cant remember exact name but its the essence style one)

 

Given that this happens with as soon as that file is touched there must be some issue elsewhere - anyone knows what's up? Spent some time on google but just see a lot of these errors with no solutions

Untitled.png

Posted
1 hour ago, CriticalError said:

you try with another system H5?

Well when i first got the h5 client i downloaded like 4 or 5 clean (at least it claims so) patches and only 1 worked (others could not even start the game), so tried with just that one.

 

Would this indicate that the patch isn't clean? Maybe know where i can get a legit clean patch for h5 then?

Posted

I have no idea what could be the problem ...

 

But why after all, arent you using a newer version of DEADZ Interface. The latest version is 2.4 and as far as I know it is now for FREE , officialy.

 

Im using DEADZ 2.4 and works fine on my server Dragon-Network (H5).

Posted
10 hours ago, fzr1000 said:

I have no idea what could be the problem ...

 

But why after all, arent you using a newer version of DEADZ Interface. The latest version is 2.4 and as far as I know it is now for FREE , officialy.

 

Im using DEADZ 2.4 and works fine on my server Dragon-Network (H5).

I tried 1.8 , 2.1 , 2.4 from mxc, 2.4 from deadz website. 

 

Now found another clean patch that works by itself but getting this error as soon as interface.u is replaced - same exact error.

 

Any chance you have another clean patch that i can try? 

Posted (edited)

I do have 

1x DEADZ 2.4 edited by Tom ... (fully working) downloaded from MXC

1x DEADZ 2.4 from website ... fully working , downloaded from deadz website.

 

I did nothing special to make it work. after extracting the rar file , I saw 6 folders . I copied those 6 folders and I paste them inside my Lineage 2 directory ... replace files ? yes.

 

ready, run as administrator if you are in doubt.

deadz 2.4 is the best free-to-have Interface for H5 , that I have tested so far. I very satisfied. 

Specially the Auto-Potion panel saved my life.

Auto Mana potions for my buffers on my other 2 windows.i love it

tho, custom potions of my server doesnt work on this auto-potion panel.

Edited by fzr1000
correction
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, fzr1000 said:

I do have 

1x DEADZ 2.4 edited by Tom ... (fully working) downloaded from MXC

1x DEADZ 2.4 from website ... fully working , downloaded from deadz website.

 

I did nothing special to make it work. after extracting the rar file , I saw 6 folders . I copied those 6 folders and I paste them inside my Lineage 2 directory ... replace files ? yes.

 

ready, run as administrator if you are in doubt.

deadz 2.4 is the best free-to-have Interface for H5 , that I have tested so far. I very satisfied. 

Specially the Auto-Potion panel saved my life.

Auto Mana potions for my buffers on my other 2 windows.i love it

tho, custom potions of my server doesnt work on this auto-potion panel.

And where did you take the initial clean system from, before applying the interface on it? Certainly me using some wrong system files is the reason why i cannot enter game 

 

 

It seems i found the issue - nwindow.u and .dll

Edited by benedict
Posted
7 hours ago, fzr1000 said:

GREAT 🙂

Any chance you encountered issue with font using deadz interface? As long as font is missing everything is aligned ok but text looks bad, as soon as i add the font or edit interface.xdat to change it - title of a character gets aligned to the right, looking really shit. Checked whole xdat file but cannot find any reference to title to try and adjust the location

Posted
1 hour ago, benedict said:

Any chance you encountered issue with font using deadz interface? As long as font is missing everything is aligned ok but text looks bad, as soon as i add the font or edit interface.xdat to change it - title of a character gets aligned to the right, looking really shit. Checked whole xdat file but cannot find any reference to title to try and adjust the location

https://rghost.net/8VyxwdQYw  put at system and instal it 2 times 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. â–Ş What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..