Jump to content

Are people actually looking for L2JLucera Source code?   

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Are people actually looking for L2JLucera Source code?

    • Yes
      39
    • No
      9
  2. 2. Is it worth sharing all the source code?

    • Yes
      38
    • No
      10


Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, vampir said:

I think newest jars are obfuscated, so they aren't going to be that easy to edit later on.

I be wanted to look how he will support him in this case. All exceptions will have unreadable data. And everyone attempts will looks like "find that. don't know what".

Posted
23 hours ago, Rootware said:

I be wanted to look how he will support him in this case. All exceptions will have unreadable data. And everyone attempts will looks like "find that. don't know what".

 

Obfuscators, in same time they obfuscate, can (if you check a case on) generate the association table used, in order to (notably) handle exceptions.

 

It's annoying to manage, but it's doable.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tryskell said:

 

Obfuscators, in same time they obfuscate, can (if you check a case on) generate the association table used, in order to (notably) handle exceptions.

 

It's annoying to manage, but it's doable.

 

I tried to use yGuard and it looks ugly. Maybe other obfuscators better for this but it will cost real money. Doubt what this little project will use obfuscator at least for 300-500 euros.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Rootware said:

 

I tried to use yGuard and it looks ugly. Maybe other obfuscators better for this but it will cost real money. Doubt what this little project will use obfuscator at least for 300-500 euros.

 

Obfuscators are only used for one purpose (maybe 2, since they also optimize), uglyness isn't one of the criterias. Being "aa" or "ubeibaibaa" method rename, an obfuscator... Obfuscates.

 

The thing is, since L2J is open source, and most methods are shared between packs, it's doable to revert back based on existing methods.

 

So if you want to de-obfuscate something, since it's L2J, you actually can do it. It would take you time, but you got an "after" state, and the "before" state is shared worldwide.

 

The only thing you need is then, time. But like anything on earth, does it worth to waste hours of time to de-obfuscate something, rather than simply use another pack... That's what an obfuscator does. Waste your time, or at least prevent you to waste it trying to de-obfuscate.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tryskell said:

 

Obfuscators are only used for one purpose (maybe 2, since they also optimize), uglyness isn't one of the criterias. Being "aa" or "ubeibaibaa" method rename, an obfuscator... Obfuscates.

 

The thing is, since L2J is open source, and most methods are shared between packs, it's doable to revert back based on existing methods.

 

So if you want to de-obfuscate something, since it's L2J, you actually can do it. It would take you time, but you got an "after" state, and the "before" state is shared worldwide.

 

The only thing you need is then, time. But like anything on earth, does it worth to waste hours of time to de-obfuscate something, rather than simply use another pack... That's what an obfuscator does. Waste your time, or at least prevent you to waste it trying to de-obfuscate.

 

Did you saw compiled and obfuscated package? No one in clear mind take it for restoring. Obfuscated all - packages, methods, fields and constants names. If before obfuscation the developer make up refactor of packages for cutting all similarities with classic L2J stcructure then all work with restoring is madness. But i'm didn't saw obfuscated L2J projects yet and who will use it will be the nuts. Because the profit less than convenience for debug and time.

  • 8 months later...
Posted
On 2/24/2020 at 1:21 PM, xFranky said:

Hello everyone.

 

Is it worthy having to share the source code of L2JLucera? Are people looking for them? I have a source code from 2018. If people are interested for the newest version, please send me on a PM all the jars of your pack or your project and I will get the source code out of it.

 

Update:

I've got the message. Here is the link for Lucera 1.7

https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file


 

can you break this?
open source
https://www.mediafire.com/file/5c7exmlrh1x8zbs/Dream-VIP-225M.7z/file

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...