Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey,  correct me if i am wrong, but what i have noticed that 99% interlude packs still have this bug. I saw this in Acis, Frozen, Mobius and actually in all older packs.

 

DIFF:

Index: java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/network/serverpackets/CharInfo.java
===================================================================
--- java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/network/serverpackets/CharInfo.java	(revision 5)
+++ java/net/sf/l2j/gameserver/network/serverpackets/CharInfo.java	(working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 		writeD(_activeChar.getX());
 		writeD(_activeChar.getY());
 		writeD(_activeChar.getZ());
-		writeD(_activeChar.getHeading());
+		writeD(0);
 		writeD(_activeChar.getObjectId());
 		writeS(_activeChar.getName());
 		writeD(_activeChar.getRace().ordinal());
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
 		
 		writeD(_activeChar.getAppearance().getNameColor());
 		
-		writeD(0x00); // isRunning() as in UserInfo?
+		writeD(_activeChar.getHeading());
 		
 		writeD(_activeChar.getPledgeClass());
 		writeD(_activeChar.getPledgeType());

 

Edited by Vilmis
Posted (edited)
		writeC(0x03);
		writeD(_activeChar.getX());
		writeD(_activeChar.getY());
		writeD(_activeChar.getZ());
		writeD(_activeChar.getHeading()); /* Removing this because it's Vehicle ID */

You are fixed character model heading only for known players, but for self in UserInfo forgot.

Edited by Rootware
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, Rootware said:

		writeC(0x03);
		writeD(_activeChar.getX());
		writeD(_activeChar.getY());
		writeD(_activeChar.getZ());
		writeD(_activeChar.getHeading()); /* Removing this because it's Vehicle ID */

You are fixed character model heading only for known players, but for self in UserInfo forgot.

I know this and yep, it's vehicle id.
Btw, what's about userinfo i think this  is client bug (ncsoft bug) or am i wrong? UserInfo even can not send heading. That's why never tried to fix it. I saw this bug in new clients and etc.

Edited by Vilmis
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vilmis said:

I know this and yep, it's vehicle id.
Btw, what's about userinfo i think this  is client bug (ncsoft bug) or am i wrong? UserInfo even can not send heading. That's why never tried to fix it. I saw this bug in new clients and etc.

 

When you entering to the world you can see own/another character always with wrong heading. It's client bug, because model in client always spawns w/o server heading - always look to the east. While teleporting the heading saving and processing correct for all characters own or another.

Edited by Rootware
Posted
32 minutes ago, Rootware said:

 

When you entering to the world you can see own/another character always with wrong heading. It's client bug, because model in client always spawns w/o server heading - always look to the east. While teleporting the heading saving and processing correct for all characters own or another.

I know that as well, mate, but thanks for your info.
For example: UserInfo doesn't send heading at all, but for some reason many l2j packs still have this heading in UserInfo. Instead of heading should be vehicle id as well, but not heading.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vilmis said:

I know that as well, mate, but thanks for your info.
For example: UserInfo doesn't send heading at all, but for some reason many l2j packs still have this heading in UserInfo. Instead of heading should be vehicle id as well, but not heading.

 

Sure. You are right, my mistake. I meant TeleportToLacation packet. You can send him with special params (for disable black screen for teleport) after UserInfo packet while character entering onto the world and you will see correct character rotation.

Edited by Rootware
Posted (edited)

the only heading mistake on mobius god clients* is on teleport etc  

 

i havent see something else wrong

 

 

edit* i just read u talk about c6

 

my bad

Edited by Pamela32
Posted (edited)

It has been fixed since Kamael on L2J, so postIL chronicles, and probably few downgrades, aren't impacted.

 

If you ask "why", I would answer "why not" ? If we use a base L2J IL, we inherit from all L2J issues. Whoever use L2J IL shares a common pool of issues than people can eventually see and fix.

 

I won't blame you if you don't have EventTrigger, ShortCutDelete (than L2J doesn't even have nowadays, btw), ExDuelEnemyRelation or ExMPCCPartyInfoUpdate packets. Or one of the 20+ PvP event.

 

It's all about seeing it, first. That's simply tell you than every project shares the same mommy DNA.

 

Ty for the find.

 

@sotid Everytime you addKnownObject a Player on your knownlist. Which is : teleport and enterworld. Few appreciations of that edit is on a market, people won't be on the same heading anymore, or if you want to backstab correctly a Player (which didn't yet move) upon teleport on pvp grounds.

Edited by Tryskell
Posted
23 minutes ago, Tryskell said:

@sotid Everytime you addKnownObject a Player on your knownlist. Which is : teleport and enterworld. Few appreciations of that edit is on a market, people won't be on the same heading anymore, or if you want to backstab correctly a Player (which didn't yet move) upon teleport on pvp grounds.

Thank you!

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, sotid said:

Thank you!

 

For self teleport heading, you have to correctly address Player heading upon TeleportToLocation packet. CharInfo is only for others people who are appearing on a zone you are "seeing the first time".

 

Will be part of aCis rev 382, it is validated on L2OvC.

Edited by Tryskell
Posted
59 minutes ago, Tryskell said:

 

For self teleport heading, you have to correctly address Player heading upon TeleportToLocation packet. CharInfo is only for others people who are appearing on a zone you are "seeing the first time".

What you want do in TeleportToLocation packet? It doesn't have heading in interlude packet. Also, on teleport you don't need add correction or something like that for heading, because heading stays same after teleport and broadcasting correctly for others. 
Just only one main problem is to fix heading on first log in for yourself, because it's a visual bug of UserInfo which doesn't send heading at all.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vilmis said:

What you want do in TeleportToLocation packet? It doesn't have heading in interlude packet. Also, on teleport you don't need add correction or something like that for heading, because heading stays same after teleport and broadcasting correctly for others. 
Just only one main problem is to fix heading on first log in for yourself, because it's a visual bug of UserInfo which doesn't send heading at all.

 

Try this up.

 

	@Override
	protected final void writeImpl()
	{
		writeC(0x22);
		
		writeD(_objectId);
		writeD(_x);
		writeD(_y);
		writeD(_z);
		writeD(_isFastTeleport ? 1 : 0); // 0 - with black screen, 1 - fast teleport (for correcting position)
		writeD(_heading);
	}

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Rootware said:

 

Try this up.

 


	@Override
	protected final void writeImpl()
	{
		writeC(0x22);
		
		writeD(_objectId);
		writeD(_x);
		writeD(_y);
		writeD(_z);
		writeD(_isFastTeleport ? 1 : 0); // 0 - with black screen, 1 - fast teleport (for correcting position)
		writeD(_heading);
	}

 

Did you try? This „FastTeleport“ works in interlude, but heading doesn't look like would be working as i mentioned before or maybe i'm wrong? You can add almost everything whatever you want to writeImpl() if they are in the bottom they won't break the packet.

btw, if  TeleportToLocation would send heading which means //goup should fix your heading when entered to world again and have heading from database, but it doesn't.

Edited by Vilmis

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • IAM one of customers of this project. Have anti cheat, have user panel everything is working. Blocking adrenaline trashy plans without any problems.  So just GL for all lin2 project. I get support every time I need it. 
    • Convert package formats from Old to New in one click Create new packages of any format Lineage2Ver121 encryption (included in the package) Safe editing: work in a copy, full undo history (Ctrl+Z / Ctrl+Shift+Z), single "Save" button System integration Open .utx / .ugx files with a single click in Explorer (associations are registered during installation) One example: open a file and add its tab to an existing window Multilingual interface (EN, RU, UK, ES, PT, EL, KO, VI, ZH) — the language is picked up from the system Supported formats Packages: UTX, UGX Textures: RGBA8, DXT1, DXT3, DXT5, G16, P8 Resources: GFX (Scaleform) Requirements Windows. Java is not required—it's included in the build. Installation Run La2Tools-3.0.2.exe—the installer will create shortcuts and register related files. Alternatively, use the portable version. https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_setup.exe   https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_portable.zip  - Portable version  
    • WHEN SAYING “YES” IS A MISTAKE Not every project is worth taking on, even if the client is ready to pay. Sometimes refusing isn’t about losing money — it’s about protecting your reputation and time. Over the years, we’ve learned to quickly spot the cases that are almost guaranteed to turn into problems. Here are the most common situations where we turn down work: ▪ The client wants it “like everyone else’s,” but with lots of custom changes and on a minimal budget ▪ There are no proper source materials, yet the deadlines are already burning and everything is needed “yesterday” ▪ Constant changes to requirements after the work has already started ▪ A task with a very low chance of success, but very high expectations ▪ The client isn’t willing to discuss the process and sees us as just an executor - A good result almost always starts when both sides have an honest understanding of the risks and real possibilities of the project. If you’re currently discussing a project and unsure whether to move forward — write to us. We’ll honestly and directly tell you whether it’s worth taking on or if it’s better to look for another solution. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #documents #drawing #photoshop #refuse #cases
    • The price reflects the value of the project, not just the source files. This is a complete, production-ready server that has already proven itself over the course of a full year, with a loyal player base and no major issues requiring ongoing development. To put it into perspective, the asking price is approximately what the server generated in one year. You're not buying an unfinished pack that still needs months of work, you're buying a polished, fully tested, revenue-proven project that's ready to go online. Considering that, I believe €35000 is a fair price.
    • How we can explain the amount? Is something special there in?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..