Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

l2off cached doesn't do what i think you think it does ...

 

Quote


The main problem with l2j is that everything depends on the data to run.

 

i had to do a double take and rub my eyes on this one i can't believe i actually read that

 

i don't think anyone's gonna argue with you on whether it's possible to do what you're talking about, it clearly is and obviously many enterprise services are ran that way, i think the greater question is why the hell would you? for an academic exercise sure go for it, have fun... but as a practical improvement to l2j as it currently stands? there's 1000 other places that development time would be 1000000x better spent

Edited by Anarchy
Posted
3 hours ago, .Elfocrash said:

 

About the second part of your reply, it is just for fun, nothing serious. Just me messing around. I will probably forget about it in a week or so like i usually do.

everything is explained, now i know why you have this signature so you dont forget......... i got stunned.

Posted

That's the way most modern MMOs and other type of online games work (including Overwatch) and it can be very efficient on many occasions. However I doubt Lineage 2 private servers can benefit from it since the player base almost never exceeds 800-1000 players per server.

 

From what I've read, the point of servers working that way is to prevent overloading a single server. You can have multiple servers to handle the players. Large MMOs even have Node servers, which is basically having a specific server for a specifc chunk of area in the game (meaning when a player switches area he switches server too).

Posted
1 minute ago, .Elfocrash said:

Overwatch deploys one server per game dynamically.

 

What im talking about here is node servers in a cluster. Pretty much how every online game works nowadays anyway.

I think besides the game itself even when you are on the menu you are not in a single server. I read that the general chat (which can be seen by some players and can't by others) is basically your server's chat.

 

It is indeed the correct way to handle an online game, but still there would be no point implementing it in L2 besides for fun.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..