Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

Well, since Reputation System on this forum is broken and - supposedly - it was going to be disabled after latest update,, I have a simply suggestion:
- since Reputation System should award active / sharing community members then:

1. Only Author inside his own topics can RECIVE Reputation Points (at first post only) - for his share.
2. Only Author of the topic can GIVE Reputation Point to ONE USER inside his topic - in case someone solve his problem or gave him a good advice.

NO OTHER OPTIONS TO GIVE OR RECIVE Reputation Points.

 

No more random +/- Reputation Points from random posts.

 

On 4.03.2017 at 11:29 AM, Maxtor said:

 

 

Posted (edited)

I don't think it's good solution, but i think limiting reputation points that user can give per day and also make it only for few sections since i see alot of rep points in Spam Topics which is really reduce the value of of it, and it's not important for anyone now +100 points == -100 points , currently reputation represent nothing.

 

Also i suggest having a Section for suggestions....

Edited by SamDev-Coder
Posted

Well, tbh before the upgrade to ips aVVe (or someone else, don't really remember atm) made a topic about the negative reps and because the reputation system was about to change we did no action to fix them. Now the old reps still exists, i guess a clean up on those spam reps would be a nice idea. On the other hand, giving tons of negative reputations because of a "fight" between members won't really give us the whole picture about how many reputation points someone should have or not.

Posted

It's not about fights, it's about false feedback - why ppl should give themself +1 rep in Spam Section? Random posts with idiotic meaning. Reputation System should be an award for ACTIVE members of the community, not random trolls posting stupid links.
If "Feedback System" is good for users who sells theirs works then "Reputation System" should be available ONLY for Authors - who shares stuff, and NOT for trolls who gives each other +1 becuase they shit on other ppl posts. Do You know what I mean?

If Maxtor want to keep this Rep System and the numbers of +'s should mean something, then he need to give this system a proper fix. If "Feedback System" is for sellers, then "Reputation System" is for active members - so as I've saide, it should be BASED on Authors and theirs topics. Autor can recive Rep Points (but only at first post on the topic), and only Authors can give Rep Point (one per topic) to "thank" someone for help. PERIOD.

Posted
4 hours ago, aVVe said:

It's not about fights, it's about false feedback - why ppl should give themself +1 rep in Spam Section? Random posts with idiotic meaning. Reputation System should be an award for ACTIVE members of the community, not random trolls posting stupid links.
If "Feedback System" is good for users who sells theirs works then "Reputation System" should be available ONLY for Authors - who shares stuff, and NOT for trolls who gives each other +1 becuase they shit on other ppl posts. Do You know what I mean?

I totally get and agree with what you said.

 

4 hours ago, aVVe said:

If Maxtor want to keep this Rep System and the numbers of +'s should mean something, then he need to give this system a proper fix. If "Feedback System" is for sellers, then "Reputation System" is for active members - so as I've saide, it should be BASED on Authors and theirs topics. Autor can recive Rep Points (but only at first post on the topic), and only Authors can give Rep Point (one per topic) to "thank" someone for help. PERIOD.

Unfortunately there is no option of doing something like that. I mean we can make it so people can rep + or - to topic authors and only that but there is no option of allowing rep to authors and only to one reply (for posts like a solution that helped someone) and Maxtor increased the maximum amount of reputations users can give in order to reward active people, he even gave normal members that option something that didn't exist on the previous versions not even on SMF with the Karma system. The fact that people abuse this, it's member's option to abuse this system but what we can do? "Punish" everyone by removing the reputation system because 2 or 3 users abuse the reputation system?

My opinion is to warn users abusing the reputation system and immediately remove every single rep this user gave and received no matter if it's negative or positive. 

Posted

Reactions should NOT influence the reputation system and true, ONLY the author of the topic should get reputation. Possibility to give karma/rep to any post, it's a crap. Else allow it for certain sections, like helping topics - sure thing, someone give a solution and boom, you can 'reward' him with reputation. That's legit.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Designatix said:

Unfortunately there is no option of doing something like that. I mean we can make it so people can rep + or - to topic authors and only that but there is no option of allowing rep to authors and only to one reply (for posts like a solution that helped someone) and Maxtor increased the maximum amount of reputations users can give in order to reward active people, he even gave normal members that option something that didn't exist on the previous versions not even on SMF with the Karma system. The fact that people abuse this, it's member's option to abuse this system but what we can do? "Punish" everyone by removing the reputation system because 2 or 3 users abuse the reputation system?

My opinion is to warn users abusing the reputation system and immediately remove every single rep this user gave and received no matter if it's negative or positive. 

Doesnt it work on L2JBrasil ? I know I saw it on one forum - some kind of restriction that only author can give +1 (or a beer :D) to other user for help, but on the other hand, only autr can recive rep point for sharing and such.

I guess SweeTs have a good point too - there is no need for random "thank You". I guess the rep system can work standalone for only authors - ppl who create and share stuff and only at first post of the topic.

Edited by aVVe
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • You invent yourself a life - bad for you, one of the inner core dev, fernandopm, which worked hard over aCis quests from 2011 to 2016 is argentinian. I teached him back in time to work and make proper quests. My dev team comes from 10+ countries and I'm myself french. "Racist/nationalist" card ? Not working bro.   Not sure why I should thank you to send me questions, and regarding bug reports, so far, I got none of yours in either discord, gitlab, or forums. I'm sorry if you feel "ignored", but that's more a psychanalyst you need to speak with if you put emotions towards someones' appreciation over a forum. I never ignore a bug report, and if so (like skills reports), it's because I got a bigger plan (skills refactor, in that case). In any case, I delivered cookies for the bug report/fix, even if it dated of months, with proper credits over changesets. "Victim card" ? Not really working, but ok, maybe you're "emotional".   I barely make money out of aCis, for the spent time - simply selling my services, or even coding/administrating a minecraft/L2J server would make far more money. Breaking intentionally things would be stupid. If you don't understand I'm not the only one working on that pack, I can't help you. Also, the scale of edits is sometimes extreme - AI L2OFF ? 1800 files added. How do you want everything works in a single shot ? "Exploiting noobz for money" card ? Still not working, or I'm a terrible businessman.   Meanwhile - you shadow advertise your project, L2JOne (since 2017 btw) - you should maybe start by the beginning saying you're a competitor and aCis is actually a spike in your foot. That also explains why you act like that. RusAcis got the exact same strategy, speaking bad of me, saying they got unique fixes (you speak about I break things, they break and recode things 4 times sometimes, btw), but successfully reselling latest revision with poorly executed stuff. "aCis is good, Tryskell is ok, but I solve all issues in extreme low time so I can piss over him" card ? Mmmmhhhh.   Our conversation ends here if you want, I don't force ppl to speak with me if they don't want - hopefully, people would understand I'm not the arrogant one and the one who doesn't want to talk, or even collaborate. :). I understand you got your own project and got no will to improve aCis.   NOTE : I'm extremely happy for your call of ExShowServerPrimitive with getValidGeoLocation, extremely impressive. Arrogant, no. Sarcastic ? Maybe.   Good night everyone.
    • Hi. @GX-Ext, svn does not work. is there anywhere else where we can get source code? Thank you so much.
    • new synchronized movement with neoengine obstacle correction I reported bugs to you and you completely ignored me because of my nationality. Yes, you were arrogant towards me. I sent you many questions on your forum and you didn't even thank me or say anything about it. I stopped using your updates a long time ago and focused on fixing my own aCis because you intentionally break the code. Just buy versions 401 to 409; you intentionally broke a lot of things for "IDIOTS" to buy from you. Anyway, our conversation ends here. Good luck with renaming and organizing; that probably makes you more money than fixing the basics. With this debug I created valid notes for monsters and NPCs, fixing the maxZ that you broke, and also corrected fly/water movements, making them more efficient. I only spent 2 months and I'm using Geoengine l2.j   NOTE: I'm not selling my GeoEngine, don't waste your time sending messages!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock