Jump to content

What About C3 Development


Recommended Posts

I think when I will have time I will downgrade aCis at least for C3 (in some years).

 

But moving from L2J C3 to something stable, that's probably even worst than IL. And IL was messed up. You probably got no features to add/not a lot missing (mostly packets related), but the stability, exploits and performances, damn, it must be terrible.

Edited by Tryskell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when I will have time I will downgrade aCis at least for C3 (in some years).

 

But moving from L2J C3 to something stable, that's probably even worst than IL. And IL was messed up. You probably got no features to add/not a lot missing (mostly packets related), but the stability, exploits and performances, damn, it must be terrible.

Nice I am willing to wait acis downgrade to open c3 server, how mutch it will take 1-2 years?? I am sure that acis project worth my waiting time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice I am willing to wait acis downgrade to open c3 server, how mutch it will take 1-2 years?? I am sure that acis project worth my waiting time.

 

No ETA time I got a lot of work with IL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I though you will update to h5 no?

 

Lol, never. I don't give a damn about higher chronicles. Kamalol+ chronicles.

 

C1, C3, C4, IL, maybe Classic.

Edited by Tryskell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

C3 client support is very easy, regardless if C2 C3 (530) or C3 C3 (555) or C4 C3 (non-prelude auth, complete eventmatch support: 557/560). C3 also supports windowed mode by default, which is a huge advantage over earlier chronicles.

 

The main problem is, C3 had complete spawn, npc stat and npc ai script overhaul (vs C2/C1)

1. Re-arrangement of the Entire Hunting Ground

2. Deployment and Adjustment of the Monsters

5. Various NPC AI

among other things, but real C3 files have never leaked anywhere.

C4 by itself has a lot of changes which makes C4 also a really bad candidate for basing C3 onto.

 

Which means whatever you create, it will be as close to the real C3 as the Earth is close to Sirius. Light years away.

Edited by _dev_
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like someone wants to play c3. Get real, l2 has been dumbed down to trench level, noone will ever play on old style c3. Everyone will be like "where are my skills where are new items why its so empty here so much grinding server will die in 2 weeks no point etc". Just abandon the thoughts and thank me later

 

When im reading "server dev section" my impression is - so many hands - so much wasted potential.

Edited by Szakalaka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like someone wants to play c3. Get real, l2 has been dumbed down to trench level, noone will every play on old style c3. Everyone will be like "where are my skills where are new items why its so empty here so much grinding server will die in 2 weeks no point etc". Just abandon the thoughts and thank me later

People who migrated to linux and don't want dual boot might. But yeah, those people don't exist and there's not anyone else, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You simply cannot play c3 knowing at the same time how older chronicles work. Thats against progression and discourages literally everyone. Since ages lineage is about botting 2-3 days for top gear and pvping 2-3 weeks until server dies. The RPG part has been completly put aside. I am strongly convinced that its impossible to ressurect such game

Edited by Szakalaka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

why messing with c3 packets? copy paste all older maps into thenew client and well there you got your c3. the only thing u need to do is deleting all new spawns and reconstructing older html files

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why messing with c3 packets? copy paste all older maps into thenew client and well there you got your c3. the only thing u need to do is deleting all new spawns and reconstructing older html files

"copy paste all older maps" is what classic does. Did you even play C3? GF mob dumbed down AI doesn't come even close to what C3 was about. Plus all the changes to epic raids over time will ensure that the endgame content is not even the slightest bit like C3.

Also, C3 was not the first chronicle to feature, as NCSoft puts it, "Re-arrangement of the Entire Hunting Ground". Deleting spawns in non-C3 zones will not fix anything.

 

In other words, do you even play l2? Go play your shit tier classic mode, you will never know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im talking about clientside. why do you bother using an old client for older content? you have a nice new client where you just have to change the datapack side to be c3 like. or did the c3 client offer better client side features??

 

 

In other words, do you even play l2? Go play your shit tier classic mode, you will never know better.

low self esteem, right?  :alone:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • For upcoming changes, You should consider making those 3 tabs (or whatever more You will have with new games) more visible and standing out, because right it looks like all topics hidden under those 3 tabs.
    • While not particularly active over the years, I've been around for as long as I could remember, so here are my 2 cents too. On top of what has already been said, I'd like to touch on a few thing that might be improved upon. While it is easy to notice and say "there's lack of engagement" or "community has outgrown the ganre", I've seen numerous forums get forgotten and die while others continue to thrive to this day. The main issue, in my humble opinion, is that the sector has been commercialised to an unsustainable extent. When nobody is willing to share anything, even if it is just a rework of an open-sourced or already-shared resource, the sense of "community" gets deminished. Now back on the pressing matter. From what I've seen, the lack of engagement could be circumvented with a redesign and functionality expansion that would/could/should include: - a built-in chat functionality. - incentives for engagement/interaction, ideas of which I'll list as separate pointers, as not to limit your creativity. But just as an example, from a more user/human perspective, having an easily identifiable way to get into "the club of the cool kids on the block", figuratively speaking, is an incentive on its own. - separation of the reputation into reactions and reputation. One to be used to posts, such as up-vote and what not, while the other to be awarded as means of appreciation. - automated ranks with actual benefits/perks, not like the current ones providing nothing. - the ability to hide text for user/group of users, not just premium/no premium. - increased visibility of the HOT topics and the RECENTLY ACTIVE threads/posts. Can be also expanded to most liked posts, etc. ps.: I'll update my post when I have some free time on my hands.
    • There was no way I didn't refunded or delivered files. I don't see You on my conrtact list on Discord, can You send me a message or at least tell me for what project was this updater? I always resolve if I can't deliver on time or customer bailes.
    • @rlfem123  I’m a web developer, and I work with technologies like Next.js and React. In the last 10 years, L2 Rankzone is the only one I’ve seen that actually did something different. All the others seem to have the same source code with different templates. L2 Hopzone also did an upgrade and, for the front end, is using Vue.js. Regarding web development, we have reached a point where you can easily create websites using libraries or frameworks. Simply pick one and start working. You will learn as you go. Personally, I prefer to build my back-end APIs in Laravel if it’s a big project since the ecosystem offers everything. For smaller projects, I choose Go. Then I use either React or Next.js to call my APIs, depending on the case. Next.js also supports Server-Side Rendering (SSR) if you want to hide some things from the client. Additionally, CSS libraries have almost everything you need nowadays to start building quickly with browser compatibility. You can seriously build an L2 website with ranks, a good design, and even a simple login/register system in just 3 days. Here are some CSS libraries I personally work with: https://tailwindui.com/components   https://ui.shadcn.com/   https://mui.com/material-ui/ Regarding the top websites i dont thing its worth the time and effort.  Its pretty simple to build one and the market is already bloated. In addition l2 is dying so i suggest to build top sites for many games.  THe main problem is not the build process rather the marketing one. You can build the most awesome website iin terms of functionality but if you marketing is week you wont exceed 10 concurrent users. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...