Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So the pack has problem with skills? imma check them

 

Tryskell if you want add me on skype, i can work on quests if u want help..

Edited by AccessDenied
Posted (edited)

So the pack has problem with skills? imma check them

 

Tryskell if you want add me on skype, i can work on quests if u want help..

 

Skills engine is a mix between IL and Freya, but all values and formulas have been reverted back to IL. L2J fix skills one by one (like, unfortunately, most of packs out there), and unlike them I think it's a deep waste of time to do that. So I got errors from L2JFreya era.

 

About skills formulas, problem is inherent to L2J, since L2J exists. And that's the biggest issue (even if, and I repeat it, those formulas are the same from L2J to L2JFree, unchanged for years) . If you want to work on something, skills formulas (Formulas.java) would be a good thing.

 

About quests : http://acis.i-live.eu/index.php?topic=970.0 only the most annoying quests aren't yet done (20+ cond, 100+ htms, complex ones or many drop rates, require numerous checks or waiting SpawnManager - or a mix of all that).

Edited by Tryskell
Posted

Skills engine is a mix between IL and Freya, but all values and formulas have been reverted back to IL. L2J fix skills one by one (like, unfortunately, most of packs out there), and unlike them I think it's a deep waste of time to do that. So I got errors from L2JFreya era.

Have fun with skills.

 

If you do it properly that's targeting, effects, conditions, cast and the whole stats system to be done.

Basically skill engine is pretty fine if you ask me. The amount of work needed to make it retail-like (better than all current packs out there) is reworking half of the pack to change something players already are used to.

 

Honestly, I've worked on aCis and it is the most comfortable project to work on... it has the least "interlude l2j" feeling to it, and by that I mean the amount of poor code interlude l2j has... back in the days it didn't felt poor because it was the way people codded, but now years later, java and its community gotten better and codding ways are much different. Not to mention that aCis supports Java 8 and I really, really hate projects that doesn't support it.

For me interlude is already way too outdated, and its good that aCis is rather closer to current l2j than old interlude l2j. But if I was hosting interlude-style server, it would be based on L2Classic and not interlude crappy client. Maybe one day we would see aCis for classic :P

Posted (edited)

So skill form are messed up a bit? well good that you used them from freya since its one of the most 

stable ch i saw so far.. really beautiful and easy in development even tho skills require a big rework 

i havent test aCis skills, it look quite beautiful. Tryskell again i'll say the rework you did is like you changed the whole structure of it..

but again it look nice. right now checking packets wt ollydbg and then ill check skills.

So far i see nice job from you even if again i change your pack structure somehow mostly cause i were used to l2j .. freya..

 

btw aCis standars gonna be higher than any OFF server in few months. i like the design of it, beside i love how 

people say off has no bugs.. is like telling me linux get no viruses.. bitch plz..

Edited by AccessDenied
Posted (edited)

Skills engine by itself is fine, there is nothing wrong about it. But the way effects are handled is wrong. By extension, as we gonna simply use parsed L2OFF data, tags will be refactored (added, removed or edited).

 

Skill formula issue comes from the fact L2J stacks chance on a accumulative way (notably for resistances). 2 skills with 30 resist fire = 60% resist fire. So you can easily reach 100+%. Another issue is the matk modifier, which is plain wrong notably for enchantment cases.

 

Most (90%) skills work as they should, the problem is mostly missing enchanting routes, and few other invalid values (power, duration, etc). The real problem is 2 or maybe 3 formulas.

 

I doubt I would work on another chronicle than IL, mostly because I hate datapack related stuff, and L2OFF is kind enough to provide it.

Edited by Tryskell
Posted

I should put my Depmax64 IL files back online and let the Acis team have full access to it so they can get missing HTML's and other things. Just have to contact DepMax64 and have my license updated and moved onto a new server. :D

 

I have always liked Acis as an L2J pack since they are focused on retail stuff and not useless custom functions.

Posted

Naaaaaaah, it's way bigger than that.

 

L2J xml sucks by design (e.g: skill start at level 6, you have to make it start at 1 for useless shit)

 

Current aCis xml is based on really L2J one which sucks even more. 

 

Beside that :

  • L2J targeting is fucked up, not even close to retail and you'll have tons of issues with it if you keep it that way.
  • L2J stats system is fucked up as well, just check critical calculation , or your given exemple on resist and it's mainly stats calculation, not really formula
  • The fact is not effects based, most of them sharing the same code base, with shitty add/mul/blabla which makes it easy to makes typo
  • L2J made a lot of retail conditions simplification, there is even missing one, and doesn't handle all type of it (target, passive, regular)

and that's just a really quick sum up. You have no idea how many dirts we found when we started this quests with L2J data.

Posted (edited)

Skills engine by itself is fine, there is nothing wrong about it. But the way effects are handled is wrong. By extension, as we gonna simply use parsed L2OFF data, tags will be refactored (added, removed or edited).

 

Skill formula issue comes from the fact L2J stacks chance on a accumulative way (notably for resistances). 2 skills with 30 resist fire = 60% resist fire. So you can easily reach 100+%. Another issue is the matk modifier, which is plain wrong notably for enchantment cases.

 

Most (90%) skills work as they should, the problem is mostly missing enchanting routes, and few other invalid values (power, duration, etc). The real problem is 2 or maybe 3 formulas.

 

I doubt I would work on another chronicle than IL, mostly because I hate datapack related stuff, and L2OFF is kind enough to provide it.

Yeap i saw this one in my freya project too.. i had to deal with the fact that skills were overpower or fail.. especialy when it came to anchor-silence-resistance e.t.c i had to deal with the enchanced skills too... and player had easily 505005050% resistance to water or 1/1 anchor with +10.

even if formulas are ok still skills need check up and xml fix. you know what imma stop my project for a bit and try 1 by 1 acis skills

Edited by AccessDenied
Posted

Yeap i saw this one in my freya project too.. i had to deal with the fact that skills were overpower or fail.. especialy when it came to anchor-silence-resistance e.t.c i had to deal with the enchanced skills too... and player had easily 505005050% resistance to water or 1/1 anchor with +10.

even if formulas are ok still skills need check up and xml fix. you know what imma stop my project for a bit and try 1 by 1 acis skills

 

If you want to help on skills data - and waiting for a bigger rework - you can eventually see with SweeTs. I won't touch to skills before at least one complete cycle, but I can commit sharers stuff meanwhile. SweeTs was preparing a diff patch gathering fixes.

 

I'm aware about what you say, Sdw :P. What's wrong about targeting ? You mean "fan" form things and alike ?

Posted

Not just that. Well unsure you have effectpoints implemented yet, but what I ask you to have a monster cast in AoE a root affecting only monster (yeah that shit happens) ? Having AURA without target type, affect type, affect scope is just retarded :D

Posted

If you want to help on skills data - and waiting for a bigger rework - you can eventually see with SweeTs. I won't touch to skills before at least one complete cycle, but I can commit sharers stuff meanwhile. SweeTs was preparing a diff patch gathering fixes.

 

I'm aware about what you say, Sdw :P. What's wrong about targeting ? You mean "fan" form things and alike ?

Well generally imma sit and check (at least the most used skills) and re-edit their xmls cause im 110% sure they wont work properly.. i bet silence work after 150 uses even if is +12

and without the enemy wearing earrings :D so ill re-edit and if after weeks e.t.c i end up with a nice result- sweetS can join and test with me if he want we can share xmls to you and re-place

cause as far i know from my freya... skills are always FUCK YOU -.- 

 

love ya tryskell <3

Posted

Skill data isn't the problem in this case, it's formula. I invite you to use the debug config to see exactly how the % is calculated, you could be surprised about the output.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Interface sources for P447 (7s update) for Classic/Essence   NWindow + InterfaceClassic + L2Editor + L2ClientDat Mobius + XDat Editor   Download
    • Hey there, welcome to the community – no worries about being new, we all started exactly where you are. Let me break this down based on what you’re trying to achieve with your Interlude‑Classic idea.   What you’re describing is actually a pretty popular concept: basically Interlude gameplay and balance, but with Classic‑style UI and a cleaner overall user experience. A “hybrid client”, not a full chronicle change.   Projects that have done something similar or are worth studying:   Lucera 2 – You’re right about this one. They use a custom client that blends Interlude gameplay with a more modern/Classic‑like interface. Their UI work (inventory, skill bar, lobby, etc.) is a good reference point.   L2J Mobius – Not exactly your target, but it’s very flexible and has a lot of examples of customizations and adaptations between chronicles.   Smaller custom projects – There are (or were) a few hybrid attempts using Interlude server files with heavily modified clients, but most are private or closed‑source, so you mainly get ideas, not ready‑to-use files.   Where the real challenge is (the client side):   What you want is possible, but the heavy lifting is on the client, not the server. The main pain points usually are:   Making sure interface files are compatible between chronicles (UI textures, layouts, systemmsg, etc.).   L2Font and localization edits: titles, chat, system messages – a small mistake here can break visuals or cause weird text issues.   Character selection / lobby screens: if you take them from another chronicle, you have to adapt them carefully so they don’t conflict with Interlude data.   Inventory, status bars and shortcuts: they must still work with Interlude’s item/skill structure and packet format, or you’ll get visual desyncs and client errors.   About multi‑protocol:   You’re correct that multi‑protocol is often used by projects that want to support different client versions or custom blends. In your case, it can help “talk” properly with a customized client while keeping an Interlude base server. It doesn’t magically fix everything, but it gives you more flexibility on how client and server exchange data.   Quick chronicle breakdown (relevant for your idea):   2.0–2.6: Early, simpler mechanics, good base for old‑school vibes.   2.7: More skills and better balance, often used as a base for custom projects.   2.9.5: A “bridge” between old and new, very common choice for hybrid or heavily modded setups.   3.0+: Adds Kamael and systems you said you don’t want, so you’d mainly use it as a reference, not as a direct base.   My honest recommendation:   Start from a solid Interlude base (files you understand and can actually maintain). Interlude still has the most support, tools and community knowledge.   Focus first on UI/interface modifications instead of trying to change core mechanics. Use Lucera‑style clients and similar projects as visual/technical reference.   Consider a multi‑protocol setup only after you’re comfortable with a normal Interlude client; otherwise you’ll just stack complexity.   Join active L2J / client‑mod Discords and forums. There are specific channels for interface, system edits and client reverse‑engineering where people share tips and tools.   What I would avoid at the beginning:   No intentar mezclar tres o cuatro chronicles a la vez; con uno bien entendido + UI custom ya tienes más que suficiente trabajo.   No subestimar la parte de cliente; muchas veces es más complicada y más frágil que el lado del servidor.   No saltarte el testeo en entorno local; los híbridos rompen cosas pequeñas (tooltips raros, skills que crashean el cliente, UI bugueada) si no pruebas bien.   Resources worth checking:   L2J forums and old MaxCheaters threads about faction/hybrid servers and client mods.   GitHub repos with client tools and interface mods (even si no son exactamente tu chronicle, te sirven como ejemplo).   Discord communities focused on L2 client development; ahí es donde se mueve hoy la parte “seria” del modding.   The good news: what you want is achievable, just not “plug & play”. It will require patience, testing and a bit of learning on both server and client sides. If you share exactly which files/pack you’re planning to use and what you want your UI to look like, people here (me included) can give you more concrete, step‑by‑step advice.
    • I’m done with Lineage 2. Not because I “grew up”, not because I “don’t have time for games” anymore, but because this game has slowly turned into everything it was supposed to be against.   Let’s be honest: most people are not playing Lineage 2 anymore. They are running 5–10 boxes, macros and scripts, setting up their characters and going to watch Netflix. The core loop isn’t PvP, clan wars or raids – it’s AFK grinding and praying your gear upgrades don’t fail.   The game used to be about outplaying your enemy with positioning, timing and coordination. Now it’s about:   Who has more boxes logged in.   Who is willing to swipe the credit card harder.   Who abuses the most broken script, cheat or exploit before it gets “patched”.   And let’s talk about pay‑to‑win. You can pretend it’s “supporting the server” all you want, but when someone can buy power that takes others months (or is literally impossible) to reach, that’s not support, that’s buying victories. When top players are just walking credit cards with epics, donations and event gear, you don’t have competition, you have a spending contest.   The community? It’s just as bad. Most “friends” are temporary party members until they find a better CP, clan or donation package. Drama, backstabbing, ninja looting, clan leaders selling clan resources, spies in Discord – it’s more like a cheap political simulator than an MMO. People talk about “honor” and “fair play”, then log their 10th box, run radar and target through walls.   And private servers… So many promises: “long‑term project”, “no corruption”, “no over‑enchant items”, “balanced gameplay”. Then after a few weeks you see:   Admin friends with full gear “testing”.   Hidden donations or “special offers” for “supporters”.   GMs closing their eyes to obvious abuse because it’s their buddies or biggest donors. Every wipe and every “fresh start” is just another cycle of the same lie, and we all pretend “this time will be different”.   The saddest part? Most of us know all this and still keep coming back because Lineage 2 has an insane core – the world, the classes, the adrenaline of real PvP, the politics, the sieges. But that core is buried under layers of greed, abuse, bots, scripts, egos and fake promises.   So here is the brutal truth: Lineage 2 is not a hardcore competitive MMORPG anymore. It’s a casino disguised as nostalgia, kept alive by whales, box armies and people too addicted or too hopeful to finally let go.   If you’re still playing, ask yourself honestly: Are you having fun, or are you just grinding, coping and praying that “next server” will finally be the one that isn’t corrupt, pay‑to‑win or dead in three months?   For me, I’m out. Flame me, defend the game, call me salty – I don’t care. But deep down, most of you know I’m not lying.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..