Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, if we make it announce 5minutes on all sites, its announce each 5 minutes all sites.

 

I think is better make a rework to 1 delay announce for all sites, not 3 for separated.

 

Then its announce votes each 5minutes(configured), for each site. 5minutes announce topzone votes, after 5 minutes announce hopzone votes, after 5 minutes announce networks votes.

Just give 1 min delay for every site.
5 Minutes hop/ 6 minutes top / 7 minutes network.
More or less.. dunno.
 
It's just info. If on 4 minutes, network votes goes to your option, players will get the reward anyway..
Sorry for my english..
 
Also, I like this version of reward coded...
I will use it for sure..
Posted

I wonder about ppl today. You take one of the best vote engines for free and you still want more and more things for free and without even try.

Posted

I wonder about ppl today. You take one of the best vote engines for free and you still want more and more things for free and without even try.

 

In russian language exists special word for this "халява".

Posted

That means free as well, something free of charge, a gift :D

 

It more than free. It is available free of charge and at the same time to show dissatisfaction with the fact that this is not enough.  :happyforever:

Posted

Hello I have an error in this line:
 

Collection<L2PcInstance> pls = L2World.getInstance().getPlayers();

it says: "The method getPlayers() is undefined for the type L2World"

Posted

If you are using old rev of aCis or frozen, the method is another.

 

L2World.getInstance().getAllPlayers(); or L2World.getInstance().getAllPlayers().values();

Posted

L2Networks send error:

java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: http://l2n
etwork.eu/details/l2nameserverhere/
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(Unknown S
ource)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.Network.getVotes(Network.java:52)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.VoteSystem.reward(VoteSystem.java:79
)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.Network.run(Network.java:39)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.ThreadPoolManager$RunnableWrapper.run(ThreadPoo
lManager.java:85)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Error while getting server vote count from [Network].
Posted

 

L2Networks send error:

java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 403 for URL: http://l2n
etwork.eu/details/l2nameserverhere/
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(Unknown S
ource)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.Network.getVotes(Network.java:52)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.VoteSystem.reward(VoteSystem.java:79
)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.votereward.Network.run(Network.java:39)
        at net.sf.l2j.gameserver.ThreadPoolManager$RunnableWrapper.run(ThreadPoo
lManager.java:85)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Error while getting server vote count from [Network].

Lol, just put server's link at network's config.

Posted

Lol, just put server's link at network's config.

really? i have my link working when this post are publish. but today no works more whitout reason, do you really think y put "l2nameserverhere" ? lol

Posted

really? i have my link working when this post are publish. but today no works more whitout reason, do you really think y put "l2nameserverhere" ? lol

That's what error shows.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock