Jump to content

Question

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Consider to use latest free revision, there is no problem with XP (there never was so far).

 

The only thing which can affect XP is the drop or the desactivation of L2AtackableAiScript, which leads behavior of many important things for L2Attackable. It can happen if you either deleted the script, deleted the line on the scripts.cfg or put the NoScripts/NoQuest config to True.

 

Or, you perhaps messed up something by your own.

  • 0
Posted
if its not a config xprate mistake and the mobs u kill are custom check if u have add them exp and sp values or its null

 

npcs xml

 

<npc id="3" name="suck" title="anal">
<set name="level" val="70"/>
<set name="radius" val="8"/>
<set name="height" val="24"/>
<set name="rHand" val="0"/>
<set name="lHand" val="0"/>
<set name="type" val="L2Npc"/>
<set name="exp" val="0"/>
<set name="sp" val="0"/>
  • 0
Posted

Consider to use latest free revision, there is no problem with XP (there never was so far).

 

The only thing which can affect XP is the drop or the desactivation of L2AtackableAiScript, which leads behavior of many important things for L2Attackable. It can happen if you either deleted the script, deleted the line on the scripts.cfg or put the NoScripts/NoQuest config to True.

 

Or, you perhaps messed up something by your own.

 

Well thanks bug,i changed l2attackableaiscript,scripts.cfg and changed the config but it still the same..

  • 0
Posted (edited)

 

if its not a config xprate mistake and the mobs u kill are custom check if u have add them exp and sp values or its null

 

npcs xml

 

<npc id="3" name="suck" title="anal">
<set name="level" val="70"/>
<set name="radius" val="8"/>
<set name="height" val="24"/>
<set name="rHand" val="0"/>
<set name="lHand" val="0"/>
<set name="type" val="L2Npc"/>
<set name="exp" val="0"/>
<set name="sp" val="0"/>

 

 

its ok by this side,still i do not take xp.

Edited by L2Scenario
  • 0
Posted (edited)

may java "stops" the exp gain?

 

Theoretically, no. But believe me, you're having troubles with aCis on java 8, if you don't update the source.

Edited by Trancє
  • 0
Posted

Consider to use latest free revision, there is no problem with XP (there never was so far).

 

The only thing which can affect XP is the drop or the desactivation of L2AtackableAiScript, which leads behavior of many important things for L2Attackable. It can happen if you either deleted the script, deleted the line on the scripts.cfg or put the NoScripts/NoQuest config to True.

 

Or, you perhaps messed up something by your own.

 

I deleted scripts folder and yea my server got fckd up too, but then I adapted L2J beta actors/AIs and its perfect

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • TG Support: https://t.me/buyingproxysup | Channel: https://t.me/buyingproxycom Discord support: #buyingproxy | Server: Join the BuyingProxy Discord Server!  Create your free account here
    • I think you should check the video more carefully you missing something very important 😛      
    • Im responding to an anonymous account with 3 posts, almost no background, and practically zero useful information added to the discussion. On top of that, the topic title is misleading  calling it "Lucera Source Code" gives a completely different impression from what is actually being presented.   I didn’t say anything different. Therefore, I have no clue how his process produces the same desirable result.   And here you are creating drama. Your topic title clearly says "Lucera Source Code," which is not actually the case, or at least that’s how it looked when I first clicked on it, so I don’t think I was completely off. There’s also no significant information about your process like  what difficulties you faced, what tools you used, or anything else meaningful. Yet you still expect others to provide value based on what? I’m not talking about your project itself which, by the way, good job. I’m talking about the topic itself as a source of value for this forum, because right now it doesn’t really offer much in that regard. So regarding the semantics, yes, wording does matter.  
    • You are funny guy! 😄 😄 😄    I was working with Lucera long before “AI apps” became fashionable. This was not something I generated in one day with a prompt. It took me years of work, testing, debugging and fixing broken decompiled code.   Of course a decompiled source is not the original private repository with the original comments, history and developer structure. Nobody said it is the same Git repository. But saying it is only “guesses” is also wrong.   When you decompile, rebuild, fix thousands of compile/runtime issues, restore broken logic, reconnect scripts, fix bad casts, repair database calls, compile it again and run it in-game, at that point it is no longer just a guess.   It becomes a working reconstructed source base!   The important part is not whether it is byte-for-byte identical to the original private source. The important part is that I can now work directly inside the code, change core logic, rebuild scripts, fix bugs and continue development without being locked behind closed binaries.   Does it compile? Yes. Does it run in-game? Yes. Can I modify core systems directly? Yes. Can I continue development independently? Yes.   So call it reconstructed, decompiled, cleaned, restored or whatever name you prefer. The result is still the same: I have a working source environment that gives me control over the lucera2 project.   And that was exactly the goal!   🙂 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..