Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

u mean 80? that's correct..

only at rune cs was about 150 ppl. 

 

server have 500+- real online, 

 

and at this server is more pvp then at conflict first 2 weeks. 

Edited by AchYlek
Posted

only at rune cs was about 150 ppl. 

 

server have 500+- real online, 

 

and at this server is more pvp then at conflict first 2 weeks. 

 

only it... check this days..

 

boring server

Posted

im playing from internet station and today friend of mine ask admin to give him noblesse for free and he give it :)  i see corruption but i still playing here with name komple server looks good

 

PS:dont ban me because i said the true

Posted

im playing from internet station and today friend of mine ask admin to give him noblesse for free and he give it :)  i see corruption but i still playing here with name komple server looks good

 

PS:dont ban me because i said the true

proofs? oh yeah i forgot, u r a hater !!

Posted (edited)

proofs? oh yeah i forgot, u r a hater !!

Even if someone posted proofs,we do know the fairytale...It's photoshopped,it's edited,bla bla bla. :troll:

Like the time when someone uploaded a vid of Conflict having 40 referrals from L2 tales profile on topzone...They were denying that they were Stalone and the 3 stooges.The fail crew claimed that video was eddited and tweeked in a way.

Then we posted the link of the refferal page itself on forum and guess what...

Topic junked/HWID banned...

Anyway keep playing on these privates runned by clowns at best and moreover this game called Lineage 2...Im pretty sure it must be great fun to change server every month(which is the same with different name),create same char,farm same gear all over again.I already have goosebumps.

 

 

Here's to you,the most loyal of players.

http://davidkanigan.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/funny-gif-hamster-playing-wheel.gif%3Fw%3D600

Edited by Eagle_Eye
Posted

Even if someone posted proofs,we do know the fairytale...It's photoshopped,it's edited,bla bla bla. :troll:

Like the time when someone uploaded a vid of Conflict having 40 referrals from L2 tales profile on topzone...They were denying that they were Stalone and the 3 stooges.The fail crew claimed that video was eddited and tweeked in a way.

Then we posted the link of the refferal page itself on forum and guess what...

Topic junked/HWID banned...

Anyway keep playing on these privates runned by clowns at best and moreover this game called Lineage 2...Im pretty sure it must be great fun to change server every month(which is the same with different name),create same char,farm same gear all over again.I already have goosebumps.

 

 

Here's to you,the most loyal of players.

http://davidkanigan.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/funny-gif-hamster-playing-wheel.gif%3Fw%3D600

actually my friend thats the game.

 

we r all playing a dead game, we r doing same sh1t over and over and we r having fun.

 

if u didnt want to repeat stuff u wouldnt have been in this forum since there r tons of mmorpgs around.

 

i personally respect that guy who opens decent servers and keep this game alive even if i dont play in his servers.

 

i rly hope for him to create pvp projects too so the thrash u can see around die by ddos, he offers quality and u cant deny that even if he is a scumbag as u say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..