Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

John Riccitiello has unveiled the next Need for Speed game and confessed to "torturing" developers working on previous instalments in the series.

 

Need for Speed Undercover, as the game is titled, will have been in development for considerably longer than its predecessors by the time it's released later this year.

 

Speaking in an investors meeting, Riccitiello confirmed that the NFS team worked on 12-month development cycles for eight years in a row before bosses took pity on them.

 

"Last summer we added head count and split the team in two, so now there are two teams on a 24 month cycle," Riccitiello stated.

 

"We were torturing a very talented group of people up in Vancouver, which makes it harder to be as innovative every year. So, I think we are going to get better from here."

 

Riccitiello is confident Need for Speed Undercover will "a much better game" than the previous instalment in the series, thanks in part to a richer storyline. Doesn't sound like he was too impressed with Need for Speed Pro Street, which came out last November.

 

"I thought it was an okay game, in terms of gameplay. It's not good," Riccitiello observed. He's not wrong.

 

"But who wanted Pro Street? It was a sort of made up, put numbers on the side of your car and pretend to drive your Ferrari where? Or your Porsche where?"

 

Undercover, according to Riccitiello, is instead taking cues from action films. "For those of you who ever saw movies like The Transporter - it's sort of a cult classic among people with a B-movie mentality, which fits me perfectly," he said.

 

"I liked it. I apologise. For those of you with no taste, and you liked it too, we can go have a Schlitz after this." Love to.

 

There's no word on which platforms Need for Speed Undercover is in development for, but chances are it's more than one. Or eight.

Posted

With all these new games knocking on our doors we need to buy new pcs (those who have 2+ years) very fast. Even if it will be a total disaster we will play it and test it for shure. I hope they won't disapoint us.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Classic move "its not a virus, all antiviruses are just wrong." The moment someone starts yelling "FIND THE MALICIOUS CODE" and mocking heuristic detection, its usually because there is something shady in there… or they have no clue what heuristic detection even is. If your files was clean, you wouldn’t be this defensive or getting personal.   when half the AV vendors are throwing out names like Trojan.Win32.Kasidet, Trj/Chgt.AD, and Gen:Variant.Tedy.537463, maybe it’s not "heuristics", maybe its just a shady-ass .rar. If there is smoke you don't argue with the smoke detector, you check the kitchen. But hey, maybe they all got paid too, right? 🤷‍♂️ the argue comes down to trusting you (a nobody) versus AV vendors   Popular threat label trojan.tedy Threat categories trojan  Family labels tedy   can i call you Teddy from now on? yes i can Teddy               Dont forget it was not something generic or maybe suspicious it just got detected with its specific version. and not only Teddy's Teddy some others too Kaspersky says Kasidet trojan keylogger, spyware, classic nasty stuff. Bitdefender, GData, VIPRE? Tedy variant, an actual known malware family. Panda, QuickHeal, Sophos, Fortinet everyone sees something dirty in there. But sure, they’re all wrong, and you’re the cybersecurity messiah who cracked the code. You really expect people to believe that 10 independent vendors with zero incentive to conspire against your .rar just happened to flag your file as malware… by accident? Maybe try this next time: instead of uploading garbage and calling people “idiots” when they don’t trust it, just don’t upload malware. Problem solved.
    • https://github.com/gawric/Guide-L2Unity/blob/main/Guide/Pakets/Blowfish/General description.md   Perhaps you will find it useful piece of encryption and decryption code from Acis Interlude   I transferred these methods to Unity c# and everything works fine   https://ibb.co/DHhP0JYr   I think the first 2 bytes are the packet size. Third byte packet id And then the information itself   It's all there in l2j servers  
    • Hello, I’m working on decrypting the Init packet that the server sends to the client during login. This packet is treated specially and contains the Blowfish keys used to encrypt and decrypt subsequent packets. Although it isn’t encrypted irreversibly and should be reversible, I haven’t succeeded yet. My goal is to extract the Blowfish key to decrypt certain client packets without disrupting the normal session flow. I can inject a DLL to sniff the packets, and with that I plan to develop a module that extends the client’s functionality. For example, after logging in, this module would capture all the data the client receives (character data, etc.). Additionally, it could listen for real-time server events, enabling integrations with Discord SDKs or other systems, thereby expanding Lineage 2’s capabilities. Init packet(0x00) LoginServer. Currently in the java Cores I checked there is no decode function for this package, only encript.
    • whats password from the archivie ?
    • All that shit are false positives of the vanganth cliext, sources are well and who sell it is a big scammer
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...