Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

About system itself

Pauler, I want to build a COMMUNITY, which improve their own dev skills, first for the pack itself (via contributions) but MAINLY for THEM. Once you become Inner Circle you're free to do any type of servers. I won't be behind your own server developement, so more you are skilled, better you can code your OWN ideas and make ORIGINAL gameplays.

I don't think that you really understand what I posted. I "compared" your community with a Freemasonry community. And the simillarities are too many. :P

 

That's why I can almost see what's behind of aCis.

Posted

I don't think that you really understand what I posted. I "compared" your community with a Freemasonry community. And the simillarities are too many. :P

 

That's why I can almost see what's behind of aCis.

"Les Francs Maçons" (in french) has a particular philosophy about Humanity ("Architect of Universe") and rituals to be accepted in.

 

I don't get where you want to go with your look-a-like, nor with your latest sentence ("what's behind aCis"). WHat's supposed to be behind aCis ?

 

Do you consider L2DC a branch of "Franc-maçonnerie" ?

 

Have you some paranoiac trouble ? Conspiracy theory perhaps ? :P

Posted

"Les Francs Maçons" (in french) has a particular philosophy about Humanity ("Architect of Universe") and rituals to be accepted in.

 

I don't get where you want to go with your look-a-like, nor with your latest sentence ("what's behind aCis"). WHat's supposed to be behind aCis ?

 

Do you consider L2DC a branch of "Franc-maçonnerie" ?

 

Have you some paranoiac trouble ? "Théorie du complot" perhaps ? :P

When the aCis community is getting bigger Tryskell is like this :

evillaugh.jpg

Posted

I haven't blonde hair, but you're right. And who wouldn't ?

Those that dont hide something behind their projects cool.gif
Posted

Be my guest and explain what's hidding ^^. I await Pauler version too to see if it's the same.

You have a closed society where you develop a very good pack but you don't share it with people who are not part of this community.

Hmm..

Also, the friendship between the members is very good. (You, all together make fun of l2jfrozen and you support each other)

Seems familiar..

 

Maybe, the development of the project is just your "poster" and behind all this is something more than a l2j community.

 

220px-Square_compasses.svg.png

Posted

Proof shown that what Pauler says is right:

 

Thibault/Tryskell says:

*I want to control the world using L2J but that's another hand

*GODAMN I'M DISCOVERED

Guest Elfocrash
Posted

Thibault/Tryskell says:

 

In Grim95's mind:

I call Tryskell with his real name (which i saw on msn) on MxC

 

tumblr_lyfnwkheRH1qhv6pa.jpg

Posted

In Grim95's mind:

I call Tryskell with his real name (which i saw on msn) on MxC

 

tumblr_lyfnwkheRH1qhv6pa.jpg

Yeah so?
Guest Elfocrash
Posted

Yeah so?

nothing.it wasn't a comment that needs to be replied :)

Posted

nothing.it wasn't a comment that needs to be replied :)

But it wasnt even close,i just c/p'ed :).
Guest Elfocrash
Posted

But it wasnt even close,i just c/p'ed :).

no sense

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..