Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well,there are few packs that they have a bug that daggers can backstab from front.. :o

I'm here to give a solution to this xD

 

Head there :

net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.skillhandlers.Blow.java

Find these lines and delete them :

                public final static int FRONT = Config.BLOW_FRONT_RATE; 
                public final static int SIDE = Config.BLOW_SIDE_RATE; 
                public final static int BEHIND = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; 

                public void useSkill(L2Character activeChar, L2Skill skill, L2Object[] targets){ 

In their place add these :

                public static int FRONT = Config.BLOW_FRONT_RATE; 
        public static int SIDE = Config.BLOW_SIDE_RATE; 
        public static int BEHIND = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; 

        public void useSkill(L2Character activeChar, L2Skill skill, L2Object[] targets) 
        { 
                if(skill.getId() == 30) 
                { 
                        FRONT = 0; 
                        SIDE = 0; 
                        BEHIND = Config.BLOW_BACK_RATE; 
                } 

Now head here :

net.sf.l2j.gameserver.handler.skillhandlers.Pdam.java 

Delete these lines :

                                        else 
                                                 target.reduceCurrentHp(damage, activeChar);

And in their place add those :

                                                else if(skill.getId() == 30) 
                                        { 
                                                double Hpdam = 0; 

                                                if (damage >= target.getCurrentHp()) 
                                                { 
                                                        target.setCurrentHp(0); 
                                                        target.doDie(activeChar); 
                                                } 
                                                else 
                                                { 
                                                        Hpdam = (target.getCurrentHp() - damage); 
                                                        target.setCurrentHp(Hpdam); 
                                                } 
                                        } 
                                        else target.reduceCurrentHp(damage, activeChar); 

 

 

Credits : excellence

Posted

Actually that's a stupid non-retail code by Realtek.

 

mate it might be non-retail but for l2j servers that do not have a proper backstab support its good..

havent u been sweared from nabs saying omg backstab bug!

Posted

Why i need new config?

If i set chanse to 0 it' don't works?

 

FrontSuccessChance=0

Firstly,this config is used for all dagger skills

Secondly,most of the packs dont have it..

Only Backstab does not land from frond and from side..

Posted

That's how it should actually work, on retail you can succeed backstab from side & front, the chances are way lower though.

Posted

jesus christ guys please...i accept it when you guys fuck up l2 with stupid customs...but dont destroy retail things PLEASE im begging you leave l2j...

Posted

jesus christ guys please...i accept it when you guys -beep- up l2 with stupid customs...but dont destroy retail things PLEASE im begging you leave l2j...

that happens when some ppl in here make this super guides and anyone can open a L2j srv and make any customization he wants

 

 

Btw this rates for backstab are great,but also backstab lands normally from gear on a fixed rate and rarely from front

Posted

that happens when some ppl in here make this super guides and anyone can open a L2j srv and make any customization he wants

 

 

Btw this rates for backstab are great,but also backstab lands normally from gear on a fixed rate and rarely from front

 

but whats the point i mean thats 2 failure in 1

 

1st its called backstab not because it land from back ONLY

2nd if it would be like that than l2j and all the forks would have it like that but no hence thats 1 of the most retarded shares here

Posted

sorry when i say 'this rates' i mean retail ones(missunderstanding)

 

Only someone that haven't played L2 as normal player would use this rates(0 front 0 rear)

Posted

sorry when i say 'this rates' i mean retail ones(missunderstanding)

 

Only someone that haven't played L2 as normal player would use this rates(0 front 0 rear)

 

yes or someone who dont know how to balance and instead of balance he fuck up hes server

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Luniage - a custom Interlude client on Unity, with its own server Hi everyone. I've been quietly working on this for a long time and I think it's finally at the point where it's worth showing. Short version: it's Interlude, but the client and the server are both mine. The client is a custom one, built in Unity — not a patched or reskinned original. The server is written from scratch in C#. The only thing that comes from the old game is the content: the world, the models, the animations, the sounds, the icons, the interface art. The game looks and feels like the game you know. Everything underneath it is new. Why do this at all   Because the old client is a 2004 executable and anyone who has ever tried to add something to it knows exactly how that conversation ends. You can't add a window. You can't change how a skill looks. You can't fix a bug that's staring you in the face. Every server that wanted a feature of its own had to fake it through HTML dialogs and system messages, because the client simply won't bend. At some point it stops being worth fighting. I'd rather keep the game and rebuild everything around it. Where it is right now   You can sit down and play it. Not a tech demo, not a walk-around-and-look-at-the-trees build - an actual character. Most of the game is in: movement, combat, the skill system with its real formulas and timings, items and equipment, enchanting, shops and player trade, quests, parties, clans, and the whole interface that ties it together. Progression works from level 1 all the way through A grade - you can level, gear up, join a clan and run content today. What's missing isn't the foundation. It's the top end - and that's exactly where the work is pointed next.   Videos     What I'm working on now   Castle sieges and the Olympiad. The two biggest systems the game has, the ones that turn a working world into a server people actually stay on. And visual effects. They already run, but "runs" and "looks the way you remember it" are two very different things, and closing that gap turned out to be a much longer road than I expected. I'm going through them one by one. Does it run outside Windows   Yes. It's a Unity project, so Windows, Mac and Linux are just build targets. I actually develop on a Mac, which has kept the whole thing honest about staying portable. Will it work with my existing server   No, and it never will. The client talks to my server and nothing else - that's the trade I made, and it's the reason everything above is possible in the first place. If you're looking for a drop-in replacement client for a setup you already have, this isn't it. What's the goal   First and foremost, to launch my own project on it. That's what the client and the server are being built for, and that's what sets the priorities. Longer term, I'd like to open-source it. This community has spent twenty years working around a client nobody can touch, and I think the honest ending to this story is handing over something people can actually build on. I'm not putting a date on that - first it has to be good enough to be worth someone else's time. Can I try it   Not yet. When there's a build worth handing out, it gets posted here first. In the meantime I'll be posting progress regularly, and I read every reply. If you've run a server, built a client, or just spent a decade staring at this game and know exactly which detail everyone gets wrong — please say so. A good share of what's right in this project is right because somebody pointed at a screenshot and said "that's not how it looked." Thanks for reading.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..