Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

well im excellence. :D

and the code should be reworked first :)

 

Rework something stupid = pointless.

It's better to write something more efficient from 0.

Posted

Arent backstabs landing anyway that good from the wrong direction because of not handleable client-server unsynchronisation?

 

ehm i dont understand what you try to say

Posted

ehm i dont understand what you try to say

 

I mean that it cant be coded perfect to set backstabs landing ONLY from the back because the client-server synchronisation sometimes is just wrong that it - seems - to be the back direction but in fact its the wrong (front/side and vice versa) direction.

Posted

I mean that it cant be coded perfect to set backstabs landing ONLY from the back because the client-server synchronisation sometimes is just wrong that it - seems - to be the back direction but in fact its the wrong (front/side and vice versa) direction.

 

yes but its server side problem with the angle calculation :)

take a look into the l2jfree direction calculation and you will understand why the l2j one is wrong :)

Posted

yes but its server side problem with the angle calculation :)

take a look into the l2jfree direction calculation and you will understand why the l2j one is wrong :)

 

But afaik its still not correct there too and im pretty sure that it just cant be coded 100% correct.. I mean maybe coded 100% correct but still there can be connection issues what transmits a false signal and the backstab for example isnt working as it should.

Posted

But afaik its still not correct there too and im pretty sure that it just cant be coded 100% correct..

 

well as far as i tested its indeed not perfect but way better

Posted

well as far as i tested its indeed not perfect but way better

 

No question about it! The l2jfree team cares a LOT for their skills and formulas what makes them (in my opinion) the better pack - even if some skills are still not retail-like (lightning shock for example) what is the case in l2j. :/

Posted

No question about it! The l2jfree team cares a LOT for their skills and formulas what makes them (in my opinion) the better pack - even if some skills are still not retail-like (lightning shock for example) what is the case in l2j. :/

 

well we could start to discuss what parts are better in what fork its worth another topic so i think we should not start it here xD

Posted

well we could start to discuss what parts are better in what fork its worth another topic so i think we should not start it here xD

 

It would be an endless discussion anyway because every fork has its positive and negative aspects.

 

But in fact it would be still a better topic than those typical spam topics.. blah.. mindless sh1zn1z..

Posted

It would be an endless discussion anyway because every fork has its positive and negative aspects.

 

But in fact it would be still a better topic than those typical spam topics.. blah.. mindless sh1zn1z..

 

http://www.maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=163547.new#new

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..