Jump to content

Question

Posted

I'm redoing my scripts and my spawn system, I was reading the L2j Spawn system and I saw that there is spawnTime and RandomSpawn, I didn't see any use in using a time interval, and I also didn't see any use in using Buylist and Multisell, no would it be better to remove these things that have no use, to make L2j a little cleaner?

 

NOTE: use only 1 of them

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Random spawn is added on top of spawn time in order to properly spawn bosses and epic bosses with retail behaviour. There is no point to remove random spawn time as this cleans up nothing, if anything it removes existing features.

 

As for multisell and buylist, they're 2 different things. Using buylist players can only purchase items for adena (unless you modify the code to accept other currency too, which requires client modification too if you want to make it look professional). Multisell is used when you want to use other currency or exchange items or even multiple items to buy/cost.

 

-

 

I feel this is a troll question or something.

  • 0
Posted
On 8/29/2022 at 6:57 AM, Williams said:

I'm redoing my scripts and my spawn system, I was reading the L2j Spawn system and I saw that there is spawnTime and RandomSpawn, I didn't see any use in using a time interval

Are you asking opinions on whether a random interval should exist or you can't find a method/variable call of this?

  • 0
Posted
6 hours ago, Zake said:

Você está perguntando opiniões sobre se um intervalo aleatório deve existir ou você não pode encontrar uma chamada de método/variável disso?

 

 

I just want an opinion on this because in versions that have a new spawn manager you edit 1seg/1m etc..

  • 0
Posted
2 hours ago, Williams said:

 

 

I just want an opinion on this because in versions that have a new spawn manager you edit 1seg/1m etc..

Well, when it comes to decision making it's all about your goals. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..