Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Elfocrash said:

Don't bother with him. He is a troll. The server is decent.

 

oBXwGwk.png

Oh @Elfocrashthanks mate 😄 I literally didn't know but being that we adopted a policy when we opened that we reply to EVERYONE, discord, in-game, forums etc, I wanted to be helpful and actually not absolute with him. But thanks for clarification, I'm not that aware of all the forums and it helps when people help me understand, cheers!

Posted

people are always wrong about such servers okay lets say a server with full population is always crowded right but as admins they are bad cuz they dont care about anything just money.

this guy who has this server he cares about the majority of the community maybe his server has "150 online" but he does his best to provide a succesfull server without any problems i dont know why you are so negative on every server topic but thats what i know from my expirience as a player

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the support guys.

 

I have to say, we never expected an opening with a huge amount of players, simply because we offer a very different experience from most interlude servers that exist nowadays. We won't pay money to people to play. We won't tolerate corruption as we have no interest in bribing players.

 

However, we are optimistic about a steady player count growth with time, as more and more players will trust us and invest their time in us. Remember, we won't wipe and we won't announce any new seasons.

Edited by An4rchy
  • Vision changed the title to [L2J] L2Ancestral

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..