Jump to content
MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord
Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

report spammer zemaitis

amaranthe92

By amaranthe92
in Report Section

 Share

Recommended Posts

iTopZ Apprentice

iTopZ

Posted
Posted

what i see is you said you will fix it and your broke his server and you asking for money

and then come here to report him.

 

if i was zemaitis i would report you for beign iresponsible and leave him with broken server and guess what i would refund fully the first 50%

amaranthe92 Rookie

amaranthe92

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, iTopZ said:

what i see is you said you will fix it and your broke his server and you asking for money

and then come here to report him.

 

if i was zemaitis i would report you for beign iresponsible and leave him with broken server and guess what i would refund fully the first 50%

lol my fix is just accept all connection without checking. How i can broke his server for login? you do not technically understand the essence, so you have such thoughts

Edited by amaranthe92
iTopZ Apprentice

iTopZ

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, amaranthe92 said:

lol my fix is just accept all connection without checking. How i can broke his server for login? you do not technically understand the essence, so you have such thoughts

techically or not the results are not changing the fact that he has damage because of your work ... techically and morally.

amaranthe92 Rookie

amaranthe92

Posted
  • Author
Posted
55 minutes ago, iTopZ said:

techically or not the results are not changing the fact that he has damage because of your work ... techically and morally. 

read everything in more detail before writing here, he had a problem before me, my part I corrected what he had left there is not important to me. My part is discussed with him. If I am told to do something that, as a result, will not work together with other functions, it will not be my fault, because I do only what I am asked to do. The result of my part of the work is easily verified, if you do not understand anything in server building, I can personally show you.
the result of the server's work, especially the game server, does not depend on me by a percentage, because I did not have a task on it. Don't you understand that?
melron Community Regular

melron

Posted
Posted (edited)

The problem is clearly the "Communication". Both sides are correct in this case.

 

  1. zemaitis wanted his problem to be solved with a cost of X E. At the end the problem wasn't full fixed by the dev's side. So he gave him 50% of the price that they agreed (fair move by my side)
  2. amarantthe92 made a deal to fix what exactly the customer requested which is the loginserver part based on the image https://imgbb.com/cQLLcK9 . He fixed the loginserver with the price they agreed (100E) and then he got the 50% of that. Another problem comes up but they didn't agree for GS too. 

 

Find the solution guys, you are both right

Edited by melron
Celestine Challenger

Celestine

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, melron said:

The problem is clearly the "Communication". Both sides are correct in this case.

 

  1. zemaitis wanted his problem to be solved with a cost of X E. At the end the problem wasn't full fixed by the dev's side. So he gave him 50% of the price that they agreed (fair move by my side)
  2. amarantthe92 made a deal to fix what exactly the customer requested which is the loginserver part based on the image https://imgbb.com/cQLLcK9 . He fixed the loginserver with the price they agreed (100E) and then he got the 50% of that. Another problem comes up but they didn't agree for GS too. 

 

Find the solution guys, you are both right

 

This

 

Locked.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • prostsmm
      Boost Your SEO with Rankopti – Premium Backlinks, Keywords

      By prostsmm · Posted

      NEW UPDATES ! 
    • NeoPacket0041
      HQ Photoshop | Verify Accs KYC, AML | Antiban 100% | PSD Tem

      By NeoPacket0041 · Posted

      LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • Ave
      ⚜ Custom UPDATER / LAUNCHER ⚜

      By Ave · Posted

      IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • Databay
      █ 7,000,000+ RESIDENTIAL PROXIES ✅ FROM 0.65$ / GB █

      By Databay · Posted

      This is a bump: https://databay.com/
    • sandeagle
      CliExt.dll from Guytis IL Projects problem!!!

      By sandeagle · Posted

      i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..