Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Rootware said:

You need good GPU and this tool.

Im currently trying with winrar password cracker bruteforcing the .rar in a dedicate host i do own,i dont think that it has a good Gpu? U think it will work there,also have you tried this,because with winrar it takes like ages and no result at all.

Posted
8 minutes ago, InTheEndॐ said:

Im currently trying with winrar password cracker bruteforcing the .rar in a dedicate host i do own,i dont think that it has a good Gpu? U think it will work there,also have you tried this,because with winrar it takes like ages and no result at all.

 

You need read tutorial for this program before thinking about unsuccessful result. You even does not know about hash rate of you GPU for judgement of potencial results. GPU have more performance than CPU.

 

The elapsed time for brute WinRAR password relates only with password length and using dictionaries.

 

Anyway, check YouTube for tutorials for make a choice.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Rootware said:

 

You need read tutorial for this program before thinking about unsuccessful result. You even does not know about hash rate of you GPU for judgement of potencial results. GPU have more performance than CPU.

 

The elapsed time for brute WinRAR password relates only with password length and using dictionaries.

 

Anyway, check YouTube for tutorials for make a choice.

He hasn't GPU :laughing:

Posted

Obviously, he tried to use HashCat on the laptop.

 

For AMD RX480 Nitro this results of benchmark:

 

Quote

c:\hashcat-6.1.1>hashcat.exe -b
hashcat (v6.1.1) starting in benchmark mode...

Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default.
You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option.
Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length.
To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option.

OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3004.8)) - Platform #1 [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.]
=====================================================================================
* Device #1: Ellesmere, 4032/4096 MB (3264 MB allocatable), 36MCU

Benchmark relevant options:
===========================
* --optimized-kernel-enable

Hashmode: 0 - MD5

Speed.#1.........: 13034.9 MH/s (91.87ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:512 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 100 - SHA1

Speed.#1.........:  4098.3 MH/s (72.93ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:512 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1400 - SHA2-256

Speed.#1.........:  1752.3 MH/s (85.44ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:1024 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1700 - SHA2-512

Speed.#1.........:   444.1 MH/s (84.30ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 22000 - WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL (Iterations: 4095)

Speed.#1.........:   210.9 kH/s (86.79ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:128 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1000 - NTLM

Speed.#1.........: 20616.9 MH/s (57.85ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:512 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 3000 - LM

Speed.#1.........: 12458.3 MH/s (95.99ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:1024 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 5500 - NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Speed.#1.........: 11734.4 MH/s (50.83ms) @ Accel:1024 Loops:256 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 5600 - NetNTLMv2

Speed.#1.........:   821.3 MH/s (91.28ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1500 - descrypt, DES (Unix), Traditional DES

Speed.#1.........:   470.1 MH/s (79.35ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:1024 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 500 - md5crypt, MD5 (Unix), Cisco-IOS $1$ (MD5) (Iterations: 1000)

Speed.#1.........:  5011.8 kH/s (56.53ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:250 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 3200 - bcrypt $2*$, Blowfish (Unix) (Iterations: 32)

Speed.#1.........:     5387 H/s (51.12ms) @ Accel:1 Loops:32 Thr:8 Vec:1

Hashmode: 1800 - sha512crypt $6$, SHA512 (Unix) (Iterations: 5000)

Speed.#1.........:    73366 H/s (98.49ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:512 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 7500 - Kerberos 5, etype 23, AS-REQ Pre-Auth

Speed.#1.........:   127.0 MH/s (73.71ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:32 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13100 - Kerberos 5, etype 23, TGS-REP

Speed.#1.........:   125.4 MH/s (74.65ms) @ Accel:128 Loops:32 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 15300 - DPAPI masterkey file v1 (Iterations: 23999)

* Device #1: Skipping hash-mode 15300 - known CUDA/OpenCL Runtime/Driver issue (not a hashcat issue)
             You can use --force to override, but do not report related errors.

Hashmode: 15900 - DPAPI masterkey file v2 (Iterations: 12899)

Speed.#1.........:    11420 H/s (62.81ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:256 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 7100 - macOS v10.8+ (PBKDF2-SHA512) (Iterations: 1023)

* Device #1: Skipping hash-mode 7100 - known CUDA/OpenCL Runtime/Driver issue (not a hashcat issue)
             You can use --force to override, but do not report related errors.

Hashmode: 11600 - 7-Zip (Iterations: 16384)

Speed.#1.........:   224.5 kH/s (77.68ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:4096 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 12500 - RAR3-hp (Iterations: 262144)

Speed.#1.........:    24178 H/s (47.20ms) @ Accel:8 Loops:16384 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13000 - RAR5 (Iterations: 32799)

Speed.#1.........:    22150 H/s (51.52ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:256 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 6211 - TrueCrypt RIPEMD160 + XTS 512 bit (Iterations: 1999)

Speed.#1.........:   162.7 kH/s (55.66ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:128 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 13400 - KeePass 1 (AES/Twofish) and KeePass 2 (AES) (Iterations: 24569)

Speed.#1.........:    43479 H/s (140.64ms) @ Accel:512 Loops:128 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 6800 - LastPass + LastPass sniffed (Iterations: 499)

Speed.#1.........:  1436.8 kH/s (79.55ms) @ Accel:256 Loops:124 Thr:64 Vec:1

Hashmode: 11300 - Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat (Iterations: 200459)

* Device #1: Skipping hash-mode 11300 - known CUDA/OpenCL Runtime/Driver issue (not a hashcat issue)
             You can use --force to override, but do not report related errors.

Started: Sun Sep 20 20:50:50 2020
Stopped: Sun Sep 20 20:55:54 2020

 

Posted
On 9/20/2020 at 8:58 PM, Rootware said:

Obviously, he tried to use HashCat on the laptop.

 

For AMD RX480 Nitro this results of benchmark:

 

 

No i didnt even tried to use it,because i actually have no GPU at all :D

 

If anyone is able to crack/remove the password somehow i would be pleased to pay for such a service.

  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Mate your server used to play with full of bots, from where you find that revenue? 
    • IAM one of customers of this project. Have anti cheat, have user panel everything is working. Blocking adrenaline trashy plans without any problems.  So just GL for all lin2 project. I get support every time I need it. 
    • Convert package formats from Old to New in one click Create new packages of any format Lineage2Ver121 encryption (included in the package) Safe editing: work in a copy, full undo history (Ctrl+Z / Ctrl+Shift+Z), single "Save" button System integration Open .utx / .ugx files with a single click in Explorer (associations are registered during installation) One example: open a file and add its tab to an existing window Multilingual interface (EN, RU, UK, ES, PT, EL, KO, VI, ZH) — the language is picked up from the system Supported formats Packages: UTX, UGX Textures: RGBA8, DXT1, DXT3, DXT5, G16, P8 Resources: GFX (Scaleform) Requirements Windows. Java is not required—it's included in the build. Installation Run La2Tools-3.0.2.exe—the installer will create shortcuts and register related files. Alternatively, use the portable version. https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_setup.exe   https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_portable.zip  - Portable version  
    • WHEN SAYING “YES” IS A MISTAKE Not every project is worth taking on, even if the client is ready to pay. Sometimes refusing isn’t about losing money — it’s about protecting your reputation and time. Over the years, we’ve learned to quickly spot the cases that are almost guaranteed to turn into problems. Here are the most common situations where we turn down work: ▪ The client wants it “like everyone else’s,” but with lots of custom changes and on a minimal budget ▪ There are no proper source materials, yet the deadlines are already burning and everything is needed “yesterday” ▪ Constant changes to requirements after the work has already started ▪ A task with a very low chance of success, but very high expectations ▪ The client isn’t willing to discuss the process and sees us as just an executor - A good result almost always starts when both sides have an honest understanding of the risks and real possibilities of the project. If you’re currently discussing a project and unsure whether to move forward — write to us. We’ll honestly and directly tell you whether it’s worth taking on or if it’s better to look for another solution. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #documents #drawing #photoshop #refuse #cases
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..