Jump to content

Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
On 1/3/2020 at 12:35 AM, Dragic said:

You are using sql version of l2jsunrise ?

Are you customer of l2jsunrise or you have the reshared version?

 

topic clean @Dragic , if you intent to help then do it , otherwise let someone else support it.

  • 0
Posted (edited)

It tries to register item elements while using RequestExEnchantItemAttribute packet - and it seems it already exists.

 

L2ItemInstance line 1069. Either check if attributes already exist and discontinue method process, or replace the query for a "ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" behavior, which will correctly save things if a duplicate is found.

 

I'm not a postIL dude, so my answer will be limited to that. Gl !

Edited by Tryskell
  • 0
Posted (edited)
On 1/17/2020 at 9:24 PM, Tryskell said:

Ele tenta registrar os elementos do item enquanto usa o pacote RequestExEnchantItemAttribute - e parece que ele já existe.

 

L2ItemInstance, linha 1069. Verifique se os atributos já existem e descontinue o processo do método ou substitua a consulta pelo comportamento "ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE", que salvará as coisas corretamente se uma duplicata for encontrada.

 

Eu não sou um cara do postIL, então minha resposta será limitada a isso. Gl!

I managed to solve it. Thank you !

Edited by HARDECORE
fix
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Very nice attempt and good luck with your sales.   Don't let the voices in this topic discourage you. Most of those people are just flexing. So if Celestine decides to write a bootkit or hook system calls or whatever and false-feed your anti-cheat fake info just because it sits in user mode just to go play in a private server with 100 people, I'll tell you one thing:   Who the fuck cares ... 😛   The average player won't / can't make these things, the big players like adrenaline won't bother (yet) (they don't have signed drivers do they ? They also run in user mode I believe). And even if they somehow manage to do so, there's a minority of players who would trust putting this thing on their pc. I wouldn't let anyone tamper with my kernel mode even if he had a signed certificate from Microsoft.    Also, in a scene where collusion has been brought out between bot makers and cheat guards, having many options is a blessing regardless of their strength. It makes colusion, conflict of interest and cartel more difficult, it drains from cheating software creators more resources to focus on more cheat guards, and it gives server owners plurality.    This arms race is a numbers game, you stop 90% of the cheaters you add value to all of us.    A couple of senior devs flexing their powers in a forum are not a concern.   If i'd ever make a server, I would definitelly buy from you, not because you have the best anti-cheat, but because you are not well known yet to be the focus of counter measures.     
    • TILL OPENING LEFT LESS THAN - 2 DAYS ! GRAND OPENING FROM - 10/07/2026, FRIDAY, 20:00 +3 GMT !
    • Add me on discord, lets talk   Discord: splicho
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..