Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, LightFusionMain said:

u need to have special compiler for that

like the one i sell 

 

 

well its just a number for that i wanna change so its not worth to give money for it 

 

until create my project maybe i will ask u to change that number for me :) 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Well(if i fully understand your purposes)the number you want to change only affect windows on the client but not CharacterCreation...

Edited by misterelax
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, misterelax said:

Well(if i fully understand your purposes)the number you want to change only affect windows on the client but not CharacterCreation...

 

 

i need to edit interface.u  of grand crusade  .. the irony is what i need to change one number only !!!

 

i can decompile it but i cant compile it .. i got many errors that i dont know how to fix them izi pizzy

Posted (edited)

Well then you can simply tell what you want to edit and hope someone who have compiler for Grandcrusade  make the edit

Edited by misterelax
Posted
10 hours ago, Pamela32 said:

 

 

i need to edit interface.u  of grand crusade  .. the irony is what i need to change one number only !!!

 

i can decompile it but i cant compile it .. i got many errors that i dont know how to fix them izi pizzy

you can try with hex

  • Upvote 1
Posted
On 10/23/2018 at 4:01 PM, misterelax said:

Well then you can simply tell what you want to edit and hope someone who have compiler for Grandcrusade  make the edit

 

 

he ask me for some money that i dotn have right now , 

 

well propably he did a lot of work so understand him bcs no1 have it ...

Posted
16 hours ago, big man bear said:

you can try with hex

 

 

i m not familiar with that but i will try

 

if u have any tip xd

 

i wanna add atribute system for c & b grade items and that exist into attribute window check

Posted
1 hour ago, Pamela32 said:

 

 

i m not familiar with that but i will try

 

if u have any tip xd

 

i wanna add atribute system for c & b grade items and that exist into attribute window check

hex is more harder then u think , u have to know unreal script basics(operands, commands, operators, actually its similiar to asm) so to change some value( operator ">" to operator "=" u have to know the value + how it could stored , it could be 1 byte but could be more. And to add something new u have to rewrite whole function or reservse space somewhere else and transfer all data to that space, because all function have predefined size (upon comiling) and to increase it or shrink is extremly hard.

 

If this thing was so easy , anyone could do it..

 

Posted (edited)

Well i follow one guide from a Russian forum 

 

this one : https://tophope.ru/threads/Меняем-interface-u-и-добавляем-свой-функционал.5721/

 

 

I did a change into interface i changed the number but its not working .. porpably need something more were i dont know what is it !!

 

 

When i do View The script at UTP

 

i can see the number that i set with HEX EDITOR

 

 

image.jpg

 

 

 

But when i use decompile i see the old number ...

 

 

image.jpg

 

 

 

F@CK ME , its IRONIC 

 

NC TROLL ME HARD 

 

 

1239129310927372138re ywsdgjadvsaghvdhgasfd

Edited by Pamela32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..