Jump to content
  • 0

help with map list & arraylist


Question

Posted

hello i have make a restore buffer with map & arraylist

so i need make a more option like player can save that list with name + can make a new list like fighter/mage

i think for me this method is better from scheme buffer.

anyway. how to get a list and make a new list with name

	private Map<Integer, ArrayList<Integer>> _restore = new HashMap<>();

i call this from add buff

	private ArrayList<Integer> getOwnBuffs(final int objectId)
	{
		if (_restore.get(objectId) == null)
		{
			synchronized (_restore)
			{
				_restore.put(objectId, new ArrayList<Integer>());
			}
		}
		return _restore.get(objectId);
	}

restore list
ArrayList<Integer> bufs = getOwnBuffs(player.getObjectId());
				for (final Integer id : bufs)
				{
					player.broadcastPacket(new MagicSkillUse(this, player, id, SkillTable.getInstance().getMaxLevel(id), 500, 0));
					SkillTable.getInstance().getInfo(id, SkillTable.getInstance().getMaxLevel(id)).getEffects(this, player);
				}
from here he add buffs and he check if skill is not same from skill list
						if (!getOwnBuffs(player.getObjectId()).contains(skillId))
						{
							getOwnBuffs(player.getObjectId()).add(skillId);
						}

 

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted (edited)

I don't know if this is what you want:

 

public static class BuffInfo
	{
		int skillId;
		int skillLvl;
		
		public BuffInfo(int skillId, int skillLvl)
		{
			this.skillId = skillId;
			this.skillLvl = skillLvl;
		}
		
		public int getSkillId()
		{
			return skillId;
		}
		
		public int getSkillLevel()
		{
			return skillLvl;
		}
		
		public Skill getSkill()
		{
			return SkillData.getInstance().getSkill(skillId, skillLvl);
		}
	}
	
	public Map<String, List<BuffInfo>> _buff = new HashMap<>();
	
	public Collection<BuffInfo> getBuffOfScheme(String scheme)
	{
		return _buff.get(scheme);
	}
	
	public void addBuffToScheme(String scheme, BuffInfo buff)
	{
		if (!_buff.containsKey(scheme))
		{
			_buff.put(scheme, new ArrayList<>());
		}
		_buff.get(scheme).add(buff);
	}
	
	public void applyScheme(L2PcInstance player, String scheme)
	{
		getBuffOfScheme(scheme).forEach(b -> b.getSkill().applyEffects(player, player));
	}

 

Note i gave you all possible methods, to store, save, retreive buffs. 

 

Also synchronized (_restore) ? Why since is not accessible from other.

Edited by Kara`
  • 0
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Tryskell said:

You can literally inspire yourself from my scheme buffer and pick the codes part you want.

 

Kara the following method creates an empty list for nothing.


getBuffOfScheme

Oke, i changed it.

Edited by Kara`
  • 0
Posted (edited)

tnx kara & tryskell for help i try to make a list restore buff without use name and if any player need make a second list the only need to do is to use a name to old list for save buff like "fighter" and after make a new list like "mage"

Edited by tazerman2
  • 0
Posted
8 minutes ago, tazerman2 said:

tnx kata & tryskell for help i try to make a list restore buff without use name and if any player need make a second list the only need to do is to use a name to old list for save buff like "fighter" and after make a new list like "mage"

kata? Bitch plz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad nevermind, i got what you mean, here's the fix   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1av7OHaGSdnVQtcBgb9MhtiIkxVXy3P2y/view?usp=sharing   CanIngnoreCollision=True CanBeIngnoredCollision=True  
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..