Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Recently I've been reading about lots of trashtalking about acis. I've been using aCis about 5 years, my favorite server L2AEPvP I based it into an ancient aCis rev, 110 I think?

I know each line of this project by hand line by line with eyes closed, I've recently ported this ancient 110 rev acis L2AEPvP into the H5 client with MINIMAL effort, (packets, datapack)...
Not saying that its flawless but its a great and very clean project with a bad reputation from a shitty community and small devs.

 

 

Basically this topic is a big fuck you

 

DescriptiveCleanErne-max-1mb.gif

 

to all the trashers that use this pack with zero knowledge and no contribution, ruining the small community more and more.

 

 

My 2 cents wannabies

Edited by xxdem
Posted
18 minutes ago, vampir said:

So how much time totally did you spend on improving the pack?

 

Lots, but I cant have an opinion on that because i am fully custom

 

4 minutes ago, .Elfocrash said:

It's a fine project with mediocre code. 

The best way I can sum it up is: "It's code looks like what a hobbyist would think clean code is."

 

Still a more than fine project (and the only one) to use for interlude.

 

Your sum up belongs to the trash can, everyone has his own opinion about clean code because it's a matter of coding style with the given trade-offs for each case (performance, expandability, readability, development speed, etc)

Posted
9 minutes ago, xxdem said:

Absolutely no reason to argue with you. *You are right*

I don't want you to tell me I'm right. I'd rather have you tell me with arguments why I'm wrong, but ofc you can't do that.

Posted
9 hours ago, xxdem said:

Recently I've been reading about lots of trashtalking about acis. I've been using aCis about 5 years, my favorite server L2AEPvP I based it into an ancient aCis rev, 110 I think?

I know each line of this project by hand line by line with eyes closed, I've recently ported this ancient 110 rev acis L2AEPvP into the H5 client with MINIMAL effort, (packets, datapack)...
Not saying that its flawless but its a great and very clean project with a bad reputation from a shitty community and small devs.

 

 

Basically this topic is a big fuck you

 

DescriptiveCleanErne-max-1mb.gif

 

to all the trashers that use this pack with zero knowledge and no contribution, ruining the small community more and more.

 

 

My 2 cents wannabies

I have 2 questions:

1. How many players hold your server? How long was online? Rates?

2. How long did you play on the retail?

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Quark said:

I have 2 questions:

1. How many players hold your server? How long was online? Rates?

2. How long did you play on the retail?

 

 

I find these totally irrelevant

Posted

aCis 110 revision not better solution. Use L2J Frozen then. *Obama Not Bad*

 

P.S. I surprises, that there was the person, who praises the project which it was yet totally L2J Server Freya (only cutted yet). aCis, as unique fork, became much later.

Posted
10 hours ago, xxdem said:

The topic "what is lean code" is abstract and completely offtopic

On topic then. Even if you put 5 years to some shared c1 pack then you can make it be great. The thing is currently there arent any good IL pack that could run low/mid server. If you want to work on acis you need to implement all missing things and also make at least some modifications to skills and geoengine or your server will fail very shortly.

When it comes to clean code, acis is not much different from russian packs. If you would remove all customs from lucera or fandc then you will notice that those 2 types of packs(eu and ru) are very similar, are both of them are very far away from so called clean code. The difference is that russian packs have all acis missing things implemented and a lot of bugs fixed.

 

Try to open mid rate on clean acis files, then we can talk if this pack is great or not.

Posted
3 hours ago, vampir said:

If you want to work on acis you need to implement all missing things and also make at least some modifications to skills and geoengine or your server will fail very shortly.

Missing things - if you need them, otherwise it's not a problem. 

Skills - what's actually wrong with them?

Geoengine - sure, that nasty 'chasing' issue is present, but not a BIG issue. Look at sahar server, he did not fix it yet people didn't report it. Even worse, the same crap happens on l2rpg or whatever the server it was (could twist the name), yet people play it and don't complain.

 

People rarely use brain, so such situation is like a gold fish. You know it does exists, but you never seen her. 

Posted
1 hour ago, SweeTs said:

Look at sahar server,

Is'nt this "sahar server" custom thing, something like side vs side with closed areas, mobs have no drop and etc...?

Or I'm wrong?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • First of all, I never challenged you at any point.   Second, congratulations—this is what you should have done from the start: shown how it worked, how to exploit it, etc. Now, let’s look at the facts:   The flaw requires the person to be the OWNER of the castle.   It requires the use of third-party programs or a modified client—and most private servers don’t even allow the use of modified clients, thanks to their anti-cheat systems.   Are you honestly certain that a castle owner on a private server would risk losing their account just to pull off this exploit? They’d have to be a complete idiot.   You’ve spent months going on about how you discovered a bug that has ZERO impact on the actual gameplay—congratulations.   I’m not saying that flaws are bad or that they shouldn’t be fixed—in fact, the flaw *was* fixed.   What I’m saying is that you’ve been harping on the same point for months, even though the issue had already been resolved in the closed branch.   It’s the prerogative of those who maintain the code to fix things however they see fit, don’t you think?   And learn this: when you report a bug, you MUST: 1- Report the bug (obviously) 2- Explain in detail how the bug occurs 3- Prove that the bug actually happens   And instead of contributing to the project through the proper, public channels, you chose to turn this into a whole circus—I’d just like to understand why...   It’s a good thing everyone in this thread will get to see who the "asshole" is.
    • To use this exploit you have to:   1) Have access to the castle vault, aka you have to own a castle. 2) Send through Adrenaline Engine.BypassToServer(Bypass) as emommy said 3) In the crafted packet you will put a negative amount eg -100000000 What this does is it multiplies it by -1 so it becomes positive. 4) You won't see anything in your inventory, but if you open the castle vault through the Chamberlain you will see that the warehouse now has 10000000 adena. The negative became positive. 5) Withdraw the adena normally and you now have all the adena you need.   I wouldn't bother explaining how to do it, but this idiot (Galagard) wanted to challenge me. And from what I can see, they haven't patched the exploit even if I reported it to them a week ago so it's obvious that people will start sharing it around.   Maybe I should start positing here instead of the official channels.   All public versions of L2JMobius for all chronicles are vulnerable and not patched yet.   And thanks to this idiot (Galagard), everyone now knows.   Baldurian. EDIT:    Ok I just got informed that Mobius decided to accept the fix in the public repo.   So I will now post a proof of the exploit as Galagard requested. Normally I don't do so, but my good friend Galagard who has his nose so far stuck up his asshole, insulted me, and challenged me to show proof:     And to be fair to everyone, this is not an L2JMobius issue as the thread claims. It's L2JServer leftover, so if you have L2JServer derivative packs, you should patch too. 
    • Already fixed in subscriber version, but this bug report is classified as "Invalid" because since the author did not explain the method in detail, the validation flaw does indeed exist—but that alone does not prove it is possible to duplicate adena or any other item by exploiting said flaw. It looks like yet another AI hallucinating a vulnerability, then deducing that it could be used to exploit a different vulnerability. No have proofs in video or a detailed way to reproduce the potential failure Go find something else to do, Baldurian; you don’t even know how to exploit the flaw you reported yourself.
    • Interface sources for P196 (Secret of Empire 2 or aka Fafurion) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
    • Interface sources for P166 (Secret of Empire 1) for Main/Classic. This protocol is commonly used for classic interlude. You can use the xdat editors which support this protocol from my other shares.   NWindow + Interface UC + L2Editor Compiler   Download  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..