Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, chris9 said:

Cant like to all ppl :p 

I know. Plus my expectations from pvp servers are weird and do not match with today's features. You could say i am a bit old fashioned on this :)

Posted
On 18/09/2017 at 4:17 PM, chris9 said:

Hello Aeron doggy, you are banned cause you try to use bot as all we know,next "the ADMINS rules" you think they let free players who flame and destroy them project? did your ever try to open server?
they give a lot of money,cant 1 kid like you destroy them with spam on shout etc,so go to your "AERON" and let that guys with us that we like to play free... gl

Aeron doggy ?! hahaha. why u talk like u know me? i dont even play on this aeron server and i never mention it in any of my posts.

ur the dog buddy, why u keep this server side ? ur gm doggie? close friend?

i dont care honest, this reef server is fail !

u already know that i was using bot, how ? u are in my pc? u can see my files? just kidding .

i know for a fact ur brainwashed, u talk in someones defense without knowing real facts, but hey thats a loyal dog do.

first u come here and acuse me of using bot, then u call me a liar, then u say i was flaming the server on shout,

so i got few questions for u:

what was my char name ?

why would i use a bot when server have antibot ?

who is this "we" who knew i was banned for"try" to use a bot?

P.S> since u came here insulting me without any real evidence of what u write in ur post its obvious u are a friend of gm or part of the staff of this trash server.

i can reveal my char name and ur friend gm reef can upload some pics with server logs where i am flaming char or "try" to use a bot

 i can prove i didnt do nothing of what u said, can u ?

about "the project" , yes i opened servers in my home for fun and testing, but never a public server, thats why i know all this "hard work" is copy-paste l2reef and ppl like u and this gm killed l2.

gl... dog

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..