Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello guys...

 

I want a .menu system with only Buff Protection [On/Off].

Nothing else..

 

Price no more than 6E and only paypal..

 

Based only on acis last rev. 

I don't have time for changes, that's why I need this code ready..

 

First I will test the code, and after the payment..
 
I'm 1000% trusted!
 
Cya..
Edited by 'Baggos'
Posted

why you don't add the antibuff shield mate? it's easier way

It's not about easier or not, I need the menu option to put inside and some other things..

Posted

Hello,

 

I would like to post my opinion regarding your topic.When I saw the subject of the topic I was like wtf,its a pitty to offer money for something like that in 2k15.

I 'm sure its shared over the net,but even if its not completely shared,I'm absolutely sure its shared separated.It's not that hard to merge that pieces into one code.

 

I would do it myself for you -for free- but I'm kind of busy these days due to my university projects and I can't.

Posted

Hello,

 

I would like to post my opinion regarding your topic.When I saw the subject of the topic I was like wtf,its a pitty to offer money for something like that in 2k15.

I 'm sure its shared over the net,but even if its not completely shared,I'm absolutely sure its shared separated.It's not that hard to merge that pieces into one code.

 

I would do it myself for you -for free- but I'm kind of busy these days due to my university projects and I can't.

I'm busy too..

The point it's not if I can or not.. I'm sure I can find the way if I try.. But I work a lot of hours of the day, and the night I must to create my site/forum.. And I can't to give time, again for the codes.. I have complete the core side.. It's a shit for me now to come back again there.. I'm alone.. 
Thank you btw Fanky.. You're right.. ;) 
 
Anyway.. 
Someone can lock this..
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..