Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

you really think that DDOS is just for items ? Admins or just people who dont like some specific admin of other project paying a lot of money to destroy other servers/projects ( with DDOS and more ) , in few words ddos is not just for "gib mi itemz or mi ddos u "

I meant that in general but it's clear that you didn't saw my point.

And i doubt Dumanist did something wrong to X or Y,

Too bad he does not have the "skills" to defend vs those wannabe tool-ddosers.

Hilarious how idiotic some kids around here are.

Posted

I meant that in general but it's clear that you didn't saw my point.

And i doubt Dumanist did something wrong to X or Y,

Too bad he does not have the "skills" to defend vs those wannabe tool-ddosers.

Hilarious how idiotic some kids around here are.

Isn't about what the owner did.

I got full ddos too..and what i did? I never had conflicts with other owners, never been a bitch to flame others about their work. Alot of kids copied my features and game style and i still ignored them.

 

And in return, i get random attacks from hell knows who... But for sure, the "bigger" servers are paying those trash guys to keep others down. Greedy motherfuckers who are not able to take players by their own, and forcing them to go there.

 

If all people was like us, than this game was having a brighter future...but since ddos shits are at any tard...they can simply fck your work for their amusement.... 

As i said and i always say... The community is decreasing and the quality of it is damn bad!

Posted

a person with brain will ignore some shitty albanian with some duals. hes making script ddos like anybody from this forum can do and what? nobody cares, let him solo pvp for a while. 

 

server is fine, only some faggots try to ruin other servers. ignore them and make ur own word.

Posted

a person with brain will ignore some shitty albanian with some duals. hes making script ddos like anybody from this forum can do and what? nobody cares, let him solo pvp for a while. 

 

server is fine, only some faggots try to ruin other servers. ignore them and make ur own word.

agree with you. if you don't like server press alt+x---->exit and let other join it. don't make ddos trashes kids

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..