Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Those guys are scammers Stathinho and FirefoxAurora they work together in HostChefs they scammed me Server Files/Source of L2Pride when I had saved in their dedicated servers after that they closed the machine ...

 

 

FORGET TO ADD...

 

this guy has no company he just bought a domain + hosting and then he buy Dedicated Machines at OVH and then broke it same with hosting etc... this guy is a fail person who tried to success but failed.

Edited by Azzazel
Posted

Those guys are scammers Stathinho and FirefoxAurora they work together in HostChefs they scammed me Server Files/Source of L2Pride when I had saved in their dedicated servers after that they closed the machine ...

 

 

FORGET TO ADD...

 

this guy has no company he just bought a domain + hosting and then he buy Dedicated Machines at OVH and then broke it same with hosting etc... this guy is a fail person who tried to success but failed.

 

FirefoxAurora, can i have proofs of who i scammed?

Posted

FirefoxAurora, can i have proofs of who i scammed?

 

Don't be a jerk you work to Stathis or HostChefs w/e 

 

your name is George Koulouridhs hostchef designer you scammed me a host+domain.. 

Posted

Those guys are scammers Stathinho and FirefoxAurora they work together in HostChefs they scammed me Server Files/Source of L2Pride when I had saved in their dedicated servers after that they closed the machine ...

 

 

FORGET TO ADD...

 

this guy has no company he just bought a domain + hosting and then he buy Dedicated Machines at OVH and then broke it same with hosting etc... this guy is a fail person who tried to success but failed.

FirefoxAurora is from the most clean persons that I have seen ever here. I Cant believe that this guy has scammed you. It cant be true, maybe  stathinho scammed you but Aurora isnot scamming and thats for sure since he is professional on whats he is doing and he doesnt represent a one-person company.

Get some proofs before saying someone scammer because its not something normal.

Posted (edited)

Don't be a jerk you work to Stathis or HostChefs w/e 

 

your name is George Koulouridhs hostchef designer you scammed me a host+domain.. 

Yeap, my name is George Koulouridhs and sorry am not the Designer of HostChefs.

I scammed your host plus the domain? Really?

 

I bought the domain and the host was on my host ( Wich i had on HostChefs )

Proofs : http://prntscr.com/60e17u

 

The domain was parked on subdomain wich is deleted when i left that company cause Stathinio went to scam an X Amount from friend-customer (i cant tell his name but if he will see this topic for sure he will reply)

 

Also Azzazel dont dudge with me cause you know i havent touch your files from your dedicated!

 

Edit : fixed a wrong typo

Edited by FirefoxAurora
Posted

Don't be a jerk you work to Stathis or HostChefs w/e 

 

your name is George Koulouridhs hostchef designer you scammed me a host+domain.. 

 

Without proofs how can you say that George scam you?? If you had proofs all would be clear i think.. But without these your reply to this topic is useless..

Posted

Yeap, my name is George Koulouridhs and sorry am not the Designer of HostChefs.

I scammed your host plus the domain? Really?

 

I bought the domain and the host was on my host ( Wich i had on HostChefs )

Proofs : http://prntscr.com/60e17u

 

The domain was parked on subdomain wich is deleted when i left that company cause Stathinio went to scam an X Amount from friend-customer (i cant tell his name but if he will see this topic for sure he will reply)

 

Also Azzazel dont dudge with me cause you know i havent touch your files from your dedicated!

 

Edit : fixed a wrong typo

 

If you didn't scam me then why shouldn't you give me back the domain.... 

Posted

1) You've rent a dedi, so what?

2) You don't have a server because you're not a developer yourself

3) You're looking for a developer to code a server for you

4) If the server succeeds and has unique and cool features (which I doubt, but let's imagine it) your files will be stolen and sold to someone else

5) If you haven't got scammed yet, then.. let me tell you that HostChefs chooses only "PRO" people whom packs succeeded.. so guess where you belong

+++++++++++

Posted

I didn't know we had so many haters!

 

Or they aren't haters, but customers who are not satisfied with the services we provide...

 

But anyway, why have we extended this matter so much? You don't like me or the service? GTFO (sounds so cool)

 

FirefoxAurora, used (past simple) to work for HostChefs! He doesn't anymore!

 

 

Those guys are scammers Stathinho and FirefoxAurora they work together in HostChefs they scammed me Server Files/Source of L2Pride when I had saved in their dedicated servers after that they closed the machine ...

 

 

FORGET TO ADD...

 

this guy has no company he just bought a domain + hosting and then he buy Dedicated Machines at OVH and then broke it same with hosting etc... this guy is a fail person who tried to success but failed.

Keep hating, crying and believing! If I am not mistaken you were the one who was crying when we called you on Skype.

I am still waiting you in Greece though, big balls guy!

Oh and let me rephrase this "I Cant scam someone when he didnt paid :S". That actually means, that when you don't pay, you have no authority of claiming that something is yours, considering that you are hosted for FREE by us.

 

 

The main problem, I guess has been solved, so ms. Stacy Doll try to be a bit useful once and do me a favour by locking this thread.

Posted

I didn't know we had so many haters!

 

Or they aren't haters, but customers who are not satisfied with the services we provide...

 

But anyway, why have we extended this matter so much? You don't like me or the service? GTFO (sounds so cool)

 

FirefoxAurora, used (past simple) to work for HostChefs! He doesn't anymore!

 

 

Keep hating, crying and believing! If I am not mistaken you were the one who was crying when we called you on Skype.

I am still waiting you in Greece though, big balls guy!

Oh and let me rephrase this "I Cant scam someone when he didnt paid :S". That actually means, that when you don't pay, you have no authority of claiming that something is yours, considering that you are hosted for FREE by us.

 

 

The main problem, I guess has been solved, so ms. Stacy Doll try to be a bit useful once and do me a favour by locking this thread.

You really believe in that, don't you?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..