Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Go and take a look on hopzone. The difference between the 6th server and the first its 200%+. We should boycott those sites otherwhise people will keep playing on the servers with the most votesbots that only care about donations.

 

Something must be done.

Posted

yes but it's only a matter of opinion

 

You can't do nothing but accept the facts! and waste time put questions like why and why!

This will not change, never  so you just have to accept it and try to the same in order to reach the Top

Posted

Go and take a look on hopzone. The difference between the 6th server and the first its 200%+. We should boycott those sites otherwhise people will keep playing on the servers with the most votesbots that only care about donations.

 

Something must be done.

 

Sadly, you can do nothing about it.

The only thing you can do is to test if the server that you are going to play its truly good and not a votebot server as you said.

Posted (edited)

My point is some servers dont have a chance. At least before all this a server was able to make good population without fake counters and votebots. Right now theres a majority of players that have been brainwashed to join only servers with the higher fake online/vote count regardless of quality or gameplay. I didnt ask "Why?" I know why this is happening, just read what i write.

 

Also im worried how people stand being lied into their faces like that and take it. I guess thats why we are going to hell as a species.

Edited by ZaNteR
Posted

It happens just like cs 1.6 servers, you were able to populate your server after a few hours, but after a while, redirects screwed up everything.

Posted

l2 conflict was restarted today morning, immediately after server went up the online count was 1700+650 shops. So imo do 7700 online (night) - 1700- ~700. Thats still high

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..