Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still waiting for a GFX mod to disqualify me from the SOTM #7.

With or without "new rules" the e-friends are and will come to help their e-friend signatures.

I repeat it, don't wanna be part of this, please, remove my tag from the event.

Posted

Still waiting for a GFX mod to disqualify me from the SOTM #7.

With or without "new rules" the e-friends are and will come to help their e-friend signatures.

I repeat it, don't wanna be part of this, please, remove my tag from the event.

That was my reaction last sotm,welcome to mxc.
Posted

Well if I understood well the problem was that Dask had more votes than Wyatt? So Wyatt if some people don't like your sig you should emo and lock this voting? So childish.

Posted

Well if I understood well the problem was that Dask had more votes than Wyatt? So Wyatt if some people don't like your sig you should emo and lock this voting? So childish.

? I just requested my disqualification, not to open the vote again.

My sign is not the best so is not about winning, is about participating in something not legit.

Posted

? I just requested my disqualification, not to open the vote again.

My sign is not the best so is not about winning, is about participating in something not legit.

I understood what you've requested but as I've seen you said about e-friends and these things. I guess it's pretty legit to people vote what they like. What it's not legit is the thing that gfx mods do right now.
Posted

I understood what you've requested but as I've seen you said about e-friends and these things. I guess it's pretty legit to people vote what they like. What it's not legit is the thing that gfx mods do right now.

Well that's your opinion.

Here it goes mine:

Waaay more legit to let GFX mods (that know more about GFX that 80% of normal users voting) make the desicion, than letting the participants call their friends and say to them "please, vote for me", if that's legit... geez

Event is about the best tag of the month, not about the most popular user in MxC.

Posted

Well that's your opinion.

Here it goes mine:

Waaay more legit to let GFX mods (that know more about GFX that 80% of normal users voting) make the desicion, than letting the participants call their friends and say to them "please, vote for me", if that's legit... geez

Still it's personal what someone will vote, you can't say "oh guys pls mine is better so lock this voting and decide.". Also Dask's sig is pretty decent, it's not made in ms paint lol.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
    • @Celestine  sorry for mu question , and post it's to old but i want to ask  ?   do you have uncrypted interface x dat of this interface? i want to add custom autofarm button but when i open it with xdat say file seems  to be  encrypted. thanks!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..