Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The problem is your grammar, it's spelled it has*

Besides that, a theme it's always a theme, so, you can't just decide that you'll let people put ninja turtles next to a anime render.

There's no sense and will only make me report you for not following the SOTM rules or make a special guide for you so you can learn how to set-up a SOTM.

 

Applause for you! Honestly you just made my day.

Posted

Let me know when this is a turtle...

 

ninja_sotm_sig.png

 

Freakin e-friends.

What's your problem?

 

And generally speaking, I'd strongly encourage you guys to stop with all the hate and bickering.

Posted

What's your problem?

 

And generally speaking, I'd strongly encourage you guys to stop with all the hate and bickering.

 

I don't get you people... It's internet... I can do anything I want to, there's rules, I'm following them.

Not my fault that you guys can't do it as well. It's not hating, it's pointing out the things that are wrong.

Posted

The problem is your grammar, it's spelled it has*

Besides that, a theme it's always a theme, so, you can't just decide that you'll let people put ninja turtles next to a anime render.

There's no sense and will only make me report you for not following the SOTM rules or make a special guide for you so you can learn how to set-up a SOTM.

I can write everything I want at the text, there's no rule for that in general, and they didn't said anything at the sotm topic aswell, what if 'ninja turtles' was a nickname?

Posted

By the way , if the voting was done only by the staff , and not only gfx i think it would be more fair.

 

It's not a promotion decision.
Posted

I'm requesting my disqualification from the SOTM #7.

It's a shame to take part on this e-friend vote event.

 

Sorry but the newbie leaves, gl to others.

 

How dask is better then yours noone knows.

I quit too. HF e-friends.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..