Jump to content

World Champion 2012  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. World Champion 2012

    • Abuzu Frost
      8
    • Taipei Assassins
      6


Recommended Posts

Posted

sth has happened lol. maybe he cared only for the interview ;D

Really his picks was lame .. I dont know what he picked vs iG .. But vs Azubu he had Cassi , Kassa and Gragas available and choosed karthus , that he is really bad on him , and in the second game vs clg he has gragas and TF available and he choosed lux (!) ..

 

Anyway , i am looking forward to see CLG.EU vs TSM on the final.. I love them both ;D

 

And i want again a match like these in the semi-finals / finals!

 

Posted

Topic will be updated shortly!

also editted the Poll, now you can only vote for the people in the quarter finals!

 

and i told you asian teams will fck up  na & eu teams haha

Posted

Quarter-Finals:

World Elite vs CLG.eu (CLG.eu wins)

Abuzu Frost vs TSM (AbuF Wins)

Moscow5 vs Invictus gaming (M5 wins)

Taipei Assassins vs NaJin Sword (NaJin Sword wins)

 

 

Semi-Finals

CLG.eu vs Abuzu Frost (AbuF wins)

Moscow 5 vs Najin Sword (M5 wins)

 

 

Finals:

Abuzu Frost vs Moscow 5 (AbuF wins)

 

 

this is my prediction ^^

Posted

Quarter-Finals:

World Elite vs CLG.eu (CLG.eu wins)

Abuzu Frost vs TSM (AbuF Wins)

Moscow5 vs Invictus gaming (M5 wins)

Taipei Assassins vs NaJin Sword (NaJin Sword wins)

 

 

Semi-Finals

CLG.eu vs Abuzu Frost (AbuF wins)

Moscow 5 vs Najin Sword (M5 wins)

 

 

Finals:

Abuzu Frost vs Moscow 5 (AbuF wins)

 

 

this is my prediction ^^

 

Nop:).

 

Azubu will not go to the next round .. TSM will DESTROY them ..Can someone tell me what time does Azubu vs TSM happens?

 

I voted for CLG.EU altough i believe that TSM will make it to the final.. Someone from CLG.EU and TSM will get season 2.

Posted

Nop:).

 

Azubu will not go to the next round .. TSM will DESTROY them ..Can someone tell me what time does Azubu vs TSM happens?

 

I voted for CLG.EU altough i believe that TSM will make it to the final.. Someone from CLG.EU and TSM will get season 2.

shut up you know shit about game, you even thought sk would win this lol
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • new synchronized movement with neoengine obstacle correction I reported bugs to you and you completely ignored me because of my nationality. Yes, you were arrogant towards me. I sent you many questions on your forum and you didn't even thank me or say anything about it. I stopped using your updates a long time ago and focused on fixing my own aCis because you intentionally break the code. Just buy versions 401 to 409; you intentionally broke a lot of things for "IDIOTS" to buy from you. Anyway, our conversation ends here. Good luck with renaming and organizing; that probably makes you more money than fixing the basics.
    • I'm on that same situation, but hey after almost 3600 commits it's almost playable! 😛
    • Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types.   If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance.   Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent.
    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.   Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock