Jump to content

[color=red]Enforce rule made by MAXTOR?:[/color] [i]"Homemade servers hosted on your pc with low connections with stupid servers that you don't even try if they work properly are not allowed."[/i]  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. [color=red]Enforce rule made by MAXTOR?:[/color] [i]"Homemade servers hosted on your pc with low connections with stupid servers that you don't even try if they work properly are not allowed."[/i]

    • Yes, enforce this rule!
      17
    • No, its fine how it is now.
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted

Enforce this 'rule' you have made in private servers section please, and I think Maxcheaters will be a little bit of a better place(at least in the private server section :P)

See rule posted here by Maxtor: (but its not enforced) http://maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=127184.0

"Homemade servers hosted on your pc with low connections with stupid servers that you don't even try if they work properly are not allowed."

 

I mean a huge majority of servers being posted are 'homemade' ran off there home PC's. I would like to see more LEGIT servers, rather than a page flooded of these homemades.

 

It may be hard to enforce this, but I think it should be attempted at least.

Posted

Well... old l2 players know how to choose their servers, tho new players to this game can start on some crappy servers making them delete this game. So +1 to enforce this rule.

Posted

Well... old l2 players know how to choose their servers, tho new players to this game can start on some crappy servers making them delete this game. So +1 to enforce this rule.

dis

Posted

Whats funny? :D

that would be good idea if toplists and mxc forum would agree, you would need to find guy that would say if server is ok or not. Also it depends on the players what server they choose, if players would choose wisely, shitty servers wouldnt exist :)

Posted

Funny part is that most servers lie about having a dedicated server with the EXACT same specs as another server yet they don't even have a domain or attractive site. o_o

Should have them post proof of host or etc or something (the approval thing sounds kinda nice but...)

Posted

Enforce rule made by MAXTOR?: "Homemade servers hosted on your pc with low connections with stupid servers that you don't even try if they work properly are not allowed."

 

Totally agree with that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..