Jump to content
  • 0

Effect of Noblesse blessing but without noblesse


Question

Posted

Hello everybody,

 

I would like to know how prevent that the player loses his buffs when he dies?

 

As noblesse blessing but without the buff.

 

I know it's possible but i don't know how .. :/

 

Thanks anyway for answer

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

It was already shared, as far as i remember, you only need to delete 1 method from l2pcinstance but i cant remember the name, would need to check it out

  • 0
Posted

It was already shared, as far as i remember, you only need to delete 1 method from l2pcinstance but i cant remember the name, would need to check it out

 

stopAllEffects();

 

Anyway other projects have other method.

  • 0
Posted

Hahaha, he wants to keep buffs, not remove them all :P. Name of method is kinda explicit... Think a little before  :-*

 

I would like to know how prevent that the player loses his buffs when he dies?

 

Any required condition ? Or it can happen to all without distinction ?

  • 0
Posted

Hahaha, he wants to keep buffs, not remove them all :P. Name of method is kinda explicit... Think a little before  :-*

 

Any required condition ? Or it can happen to all without distinction ?

 

ah Lol I just read 2nd reply and I understand that.

  • 0
Posted

It's not optimized, but it's enough for what you want.

 

On L2Playable, if you really want NOTHING is removed, delete that code :

 

		// Stop all active skills effects in progress
	if (isPhoenixBlessed())
	{
		//remove Lucky Charm if player has SoulOfThePhoenix/Salvation buff
		if (getCharmOfLuck())
			stopCharmOfLuck(null);
		if (isNoblesseBlessed())
			stopNoblesseBlessing(null);
	}
	// Same thing if the Character isn't a Noblesse Blessed L2Playable
	else if (isNoblesseBlessed())
	{
		stopNoblesseBlessing(null);

		//remove Lucky Charm if player have Nobless blessing buff
		if (getCharmOfLuck())
			stopCharmOfLuck(null);
	}
	else
		stopAllEffectsExceptThoseThatLastThroughDeath();

 

It removes all malus (debuff of noblesse, charm of luck and buffs).

  • 0
Posted

I have put this lines in /*   ... */ in L2pcinstance.java

 

isn't the same?

I will try =)

 

Edit :

 

Work fine with L2Playable.java

Thanks Tryskel !! French power :D

 

Moderator can lock

 

 

  • 0
Posted

/* */ is used to put a bloc of code in "remark", let's say this code is actually not fine or undone, you can use it to avoid errors. An other option is //, it's easier to type, and it's for one-line comments. So yeah, the fact to put on remark equals the fact to delete, except with remark you can change of opinion one day and put back retail way :). Ofc it makes code less clean.

 

PS : Using a "TODO" or a "FIXME" will be really helpful to help you to find back where you changed your code. I use personally "FIXME" as easy keyword to find what I put in remarks in the past. You only have to search all occurences of this word in your whole code, you will find like 5 results maximum.

 

Glad I could help ya :).

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock