Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just click a link you open Navicat press f6 and adding a text

DELETE FROM accounts;

DELETE FROM accounts_data;

DELETE FROM characters;

DELETE FROM character_friends;

DELETE FROM character_macroses;

DELETE FROM character_skills;

DELETE FROM character_skilsl_save;

DELETE FROM clan_data;

DELETE FROM clan_privs;

DELETE FROM clan_skills;

DELETE FROM clan_wars;

DELETE FROM items;

DELETE FROM olympiad_nobles;

DELETE FROM heroes;

DELETE FROM itemsonground;

 

 

Server viped

Posted

DELETE FROM character_skilsl_save;

 

Well without talking about the use or uselessness of this 1min c/p share, but it's not even a correct share.

 

You can close your computer too, it wipes any software. Awesome.

 

-----

 

What's the point to drop tables without reinstalling them after ? I have to add it fully depends of your own pack... Exemple, I added "character_raid_points" table, it won't be "VIPED" with your stuff. So don't use this "share". The correct script fully depends of pack/chronicle used.

 

Tk.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

DELETE FROM account;
DELETE FROM auction_bid;
DELETE FROM augmentations;
DELETE FROM character_friends;
DELETE FROM character_hennas;
DELETE FROM character_macroses;
DELETE FROM character_quests;
DELETE FROM character_shortcuts;
DELETE FROM character_skills;
DELETE FROM character_skills_save;
DELETE FROM character_subclasses;
DELETE FROM characters;
DELETE FROM clan_data;
DELETE FROM clan_privs;
DELETE FROM clan_skills;
DELETE FROM clan_subpledges;
DELETE FROM items;
DELETE FROM olympiad_nobles;
DELETE FROM pets;
DELETE FROM privatepanel_activeacc;
DELETE FROM siege_clans;

Full quick wipe GL.  ;)

  • 4 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..