Jump to content
  • 0

L2J skill bug


Question

Posted

Does anybody now how to fix this problem!

 

Crafters can use spoil 1st level and spoil any mobs any level!

I think it is huge problem!

So i wanna ask you guys what would be the best solution?

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Does anybody now how to fix this problem!

 

Crafters can use spoil 1st level and spoil any mobs any level!

I think it is huge problem!

So i wanna ask you guys what would be the best solution?

 

 

You have 2 options:

1) Remove the spoil skill from crafters

2) Find me skill with ID 254 and put it here.

  • 0
Posted

check the npc.proprieties for SkillChancePenaltyForLvLDifferences if you don't want to totaly remove the skill from crafters...

ore check for other skillchance ...

 

ore to better

 

<skill id="254" levels="11" name="Spoil" enchantGroup1="2" enchantGroup2="2" enchantGroup3="2">
...................................................................................
	<table name="#ench3EarthPowerVuln"> 6 8 9 11 12 14 15 17 18 20 21 23 24 26 27 29 30 32 33 35 36 38 39 41 42 44 45 47 48 50 </table>
	<table name="#magicLvl"> 10 20 28 36 43 49 55 60 64 68 72 </table>[color=yellow]change the 10 to 1 ...[/color]
	<table name="#mpConsume"> 12 19 25 31 38 44 50 55 59 63 67 </table>
...................................................................................
	<set name="magicLvl" val="#magicLvl" />
	....................................................................
</skill>

 

but this will make spoil lvl 1 for spoilers nerfed

  • 0
Posted

But the messed up thing is,why is this happening?

Skills Spoil(1st) level can spoil any mob!

These solutions are pretty brutal to be honest,remove or nerf!

Maybe somebody has any other ideas?

  • 0
Posted

You got 5 solutions :

 

- keep the skill like it is ;

 

- nerf it to go back to the normal ; that means java dev, and depending of your failed pack (because I assume it's a random distribution) it can be *big* for you (rework of spoil chance).

 

- delete the skill, easiest solution if you don't have any clue how to do second possibility.

 

----

 

- ask to the dev team to correct their failed pack and wait for the fix.

 

- change of distribution because those sort of bugs mean nothing more you will have more problems in the future. Today it's the craft, tomorrow... ? Why devs have to fock things which work, when they could correct things which don't work ?

 

----

 

The more appropriate question would be : if this useless skill is buggy, what about others ? :D.

  • 0
Posted

I use L2J pack,and i think it is one of the best around!

From solutions you have stated above best would be delete skill from crafters!

It is important since i have mid rate server with crafting etc,and if crafters can spoil,no one will need spoilers,that means spoilers will die!

  • 0
Posted

If you "really" use L2J than do a ticket.

 

But I really think you focked yourself something, or you use a distribution pack. Even based on L2J that doesn't mine it's L2J.

 

And seriously I doubt you use L2J (or C2 chronicle perhaps).

  • 0
Posted

Well i might be stupid but not that stupid!

I get that pack using Eclipse from L2J and it was clean Freya 7669/4422!

I seen thread about this on l2j forum,and there was only 1 dumb comment from somebody,saying:Are you sure it is a bug?

Thats all!

And i know i have not touched any skills or anything,i do not mess about with things i am not sure about!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • IAM one of customers of this project. Have anti cheat, have user panel everything is working. Blocking adrenaline trashy plans without any problems.  So just GL for all lin2 project. I get support every time I need it. 
    • Convert package formats from Old to New in one click Create new packages of any format Lineage2Ver121 encryption (included in the package) Safe editing: work in a copy, full undo history (Ctrl+Z / Ctrl+Shift+Z), single "Save" button System integration Open .utx / .ugx files with a single click in Explorer (associations are registered during installation) One example: open a file and add its tab to an existing window Multilingual interface (EN, RU, UK, ES, PT, EL, KO, VI, ZH) — the language is picked up from the system Supported formats Packages: UTX, UGX Textures: RGBA8, DXT1, DXT3, DXT5, G16, P8 Resources: GFX (Scaleform) Requirements Windows. Java is not required—it's included in the build. Installation Run La2Tools-3.0.2.exe—the installer will create shortcuts and register related files. Alternatively, use the portable version. https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_setup.exe   https://la2.tools/files/La2Tools_3.0.3_portable.zip  - Portable version  
    • WHEN SAYING “YES” IS A MISTAKE Not every project is worth taking on, even if the client is ready to pay. Sometimes refusing isn’t about losing money — it’s about protecting your reputation and time. Over the years, we’ve learned to quickly spot the cases that are almost guaranteed to turn into problems. Here are the most common situations where we turn down work: ▪ The client wants it “like everyone else’s,” but with lots of custom changes and on a minimal budget ▪ There are no proper source materials, yet the deadlines are already burning and everything is needed “yesterday” ▪ Constant changes to requirements after the work has already started ▪ A task with a very low chance of success, but very high expectations ▪ The client isn’t willing to discuss the process and sees us as just an executor - A good result almost always starts when both sides have an honest understanding of the risks and real possibilities of the project. If you’re currently discussing a project and unsure whether to move forward — write to us. We’ll honestly and directly tell you whether it’s worth taking on or if it’s better to look for another solution. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #documents #drawing #photoshop #refuse #cases
    • The price reflects the value of the project, not just the source files. This is a complete, production-ready server that has already proven itself over the course of a full year, with a loyal player base and no major issues requiring ongoing development. To put it into perspective, the asking price is approximately what the server generated in one year. You're not buying an unfinished pack that still needs months of work, you're buying a polished, fully tested, revenue-proven project that's ready to go online. Considering that, I believe €35000 is a fair price.
    • How we can explain the amount? Is something special there in?
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..