Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

why i have seen those features before? :/ i dont see something "unique"

Sorry but I NEVER saw any LIVE/!\ server with flying teleport system

 

NEWS:

Mutant Event

Posted

why i have seen those features before? :/ i dont see something "unique"

Sorry but I NEVER saw any LIVE/!/ server with flying teleport system

 

NEWS:

Mutant Event

 

 

he saw that feature on forum on seth's server but that server never went on :D

 

rain any news about grand oppening :( ?

Posted

 

Flavio, if you checked a bit, all server from 1st and prolly 2nd page use this "vote event" so .. the part with banning server wont be soon :D

 

I saw one topic, the owner of 1 server was complaining about him beeing banned without a reason. Kadar replied b/c of Vote reward system so i really dont know.

Posted

 

he saw that feature on forum on seth's server but that server never went on :D

 

rain any news about grand oppening :( ?

 

doesnt matter for me and the rest ppl this feature is not unique and it will be completely boring and useless... just think about it again...

Posted

i believe features are nice and server will..but 1 request

 

 

(Remove Dusk and let retail weapons and tit armor) it will be nice or even delete titanium and let it without customs

Posted

Protection / Formulas

More Range : Less Damage

2iu53rd.png

 

 

Anti Farm PVP System

1 - If players have same clan don't give PVP.: Done 2iu53rd.png

 

2 - If players have some ally don't give PVP.: Done 2iu53rd.png

 

3 - If players are in party don't give PVP.: Done 2iu53rd.png

 

4 - If player kills player with level < 40 don't give PVP.: Done 2iu53rd.png

 

5 - If player kills player with same Ip don't give PVP: Done 2iu53rd.png

 

6 - If target have Pdef < 300 don't give PVP : Done 2iu53rd.png

 

7 - If target have Patk < 300 don't give PVP : Done 2iu53rd.png

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..