Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello Ladies.i was at sea and come today to home. so i will continue my shares :P . so this is Mirage And Angelic Icon Skills Restriction for Paladin and TH.

If Character is Paladin or TH and equiped with bow these skills will dissapear.and effects will reload.Similarly you can restrict on tyrants and etc.

So Let's Start.

First Go here and Open

 

net.sf.l2j.gameserver.clientpackets.UseItem.java

 

Add to imports

 

import net.sf.l2j.gameserver.templates.L2WeaponType;

 

Find:

                {
                    if (activeChar._inEventCTF && activeChar._haveFlagCTF)
                    	activeChar.sendMessage("This item can not be equipped when you have the flag.");
                	return;
                }

 

Add after

 

				if (item.isEquipable() && item.getItemType() == L2WeaponType.BOW && activeChar.getClassId().getId() == 90)
			{
			int skill_id = 406;
				activeChar.stopSkillEffects(skill_id);
				activeChar.updateAbnormalEffect();
				activeChar.updateEffectIcons();
			}

			if (item.isEquipable() && item.getItemType() == L2WeaponType.BOW && activeChar.getClassId().getId() == 93)
			{
			int skill_id = 445;
				activeChar.stopSkillEffects(skill_id);
				activeChar.updateAbnormalEffect();
				activeChar.updateEffectIcons();
			}

 

Finish :) hope i help to someone

Posted

why do you want to stop it? it will not work anyway with bow

	<for>
		<effect name="Buff" time="60" val="0" stackOrder="#stackOrder" stackType="icon_buff">
			<mul order="0x30" stat="debuffVuln" val="0.6" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="pDef" val="1.5" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="mDef" val="1.5" />
			<add order="0x40" stat="accCombat" val="6">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword,Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</add>
			<add order="0x40" stat="runSpd" val="#runSpd" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="pAtkSpd" val="#pAtkSpd">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword,Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</mul>
			<add order="0x40" stat="rCrit" val="#rCrit">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword" />
			</add>
			<mul order="0x30" stat="cAtk" val="#cAtk">
				<using kind="Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</mul>
			<mul order="0x30" stat="cancelVuln" val="0.6" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="gainHp" val="0.2" />
		</effect>
	</for>

Posted

why do you want to stop it? it will not work anyway with bow

	<for>
		<effect name="Buff" time="60" val="0" stackOrder="#stackOrder" stackType="icon_buff">
			<mul order="0x30" stat="debuffVuln" val="0.6" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="pDef" val="1.5" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="mDef" val="1.5" />
			<add order="0x40" stat="accCombat" val="6">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword,Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</add>
			<add order="0x40" stat="runSpd" val="#runSpd" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="pAtkSpd" val="#pAtkSpd">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword,Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</mul>
			<add order="0x40" stat="rCrit" val="#rCrit">
				<using kind="Sword,Big Sword" />
			</add>
			<mul order="0x30" stat="cAtk" val="#cAtk">
				<using kind="Blunt,Big Blunt" />
			</mul>
			<mul order="0x30" stat="cancelVuln" val="0.6" />
			<mul order="0x30" stat="gainHp" val="0.2" />
		</effect>
	</for>

imagine he got karma for this..
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

GeoSky - double post... to this restriction i can say this: "its usefull and why? when you set this to dp side bonus as p.def, m.def stay with bow ;)"...

LOOL Look Post Date Man. And I test it And Work On Interlude Server.  I make Is On My Server Und ALL It's OK ;)
Posted
Sky" post="1389199" timestamp="1285144379"]

LOOL Look Post Date Man. And I test it And Work On Interlude Server.  I make Is On My Server Und ALL It's OK ;)

 

See forum rules, why you dont edit your old post?? :D

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..