Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Perfectly said. There is not even 1 single word about the backup, about the antibot protection , about WHO is that super secret developer.

 

Its a 7 page topic without any plan. All we hear is a guy saying he will make the best server ( after failing the first time ).

 

We really need simple answers:

 

1) Any of the old data saved ?

 

2) Who is that new developer ?

 

3) Will there be anti-bot protection when the sever goes up ?

 

4) Why do you believe it will be the best server ?

 

Not only that the biggest problem is the mentality like it was when the server started 1st time i remember it was like this:

 

good comment:

keep up with your good comments

 

bad comment:

dont like it dont post

 

thats what separates the usual server from special servers if the team listen only to good comments they end up beeing egomaniac(maxtors comment shows that he is indeed egomaniac)about their server and when that happens the server actually dead.

BUT when a team listen to bad comments too and they can work on the problems that the players have than even those who actually dont liked the server will say okay i play here because i like it and i going to bring some friend...

 

Thats how servers made not by a 65000+ member forum abused for your advertisement.

Posted

My comments arent bad. But they arent good either. They are simple questions that if a server owner cant answer before his server comes up, he kinda fails or disrespects his community.

 

As for that :

 

4)Lots of players and mass PVP ?

Thats not a servers qualification you dump underpant gnome. Thats a result of a server being good. If the server is NOT sucessful, it wont have either lots of player or mass pvp. What makes a server sucessful , or predefines strong points that indicate a sucess, is a well organized plan from the Head of the server.

 

Till now, we have seen no plan. What will change in the new mxc ? Just the staff ? Cause there is not even 1 single word from the staff about WHAT will change. I believe people deserve to know more.

Posted

-1 karma, he insulted me

he was right.

also be careful, maybe you might not know but when someone reach -4 get ban. You got atm -3.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..