DragonHunter Posted August 12, 2009 Author Share Posted August 12, 2009 Added the Fake L2J Server so you can test the L2J Attacker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neptun444 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 well i dont know i saw in the video that it sends the packets but its already sent 130 k packets to the server i am trying to make lag/off and nothing not even little lag lol so i dont know what to say but still thx for sharing it .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMeNs0s Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint® Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Btw DragonHunter you use il Pack No Final ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriamst Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 omg how to get server ip ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlemanOtaku Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 omg how to get server ip ? search on the forum, you have guides, even one is sticky i think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathdemo Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 to make this you only need a terminal it's just a tcp/udp flooder , i can make this using the cmd of xp theoritically. google udp flooder funny lineage protocol is based most on tcp connections. anyways if anyone has a l2Jserver already running , has configured it correctly so i can connect to it and it is for testing purposes , i am offered to find the exploits available to actually gain control over the server and to any server until it gets patched , i'm really furstrated i spent the whole day trying to crack a mysql but the server i want to hack is owned by an IT company and he has secured it well the only thing left is to try a bruteforcer like hydra .. but i think that there are payloads that can be landed on the victim machine. If only an early version of XAMPP was used.. THIS COMPLETELY SUCKS BIGTIME IM GONNA CRACK A NOOB BOX NOW !just kidding.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 to make this you only need a terminal it's just a tcp/udp flooder , i can make this using the cmd of xp theoritically. google udp flooder funny lineage protocol is based most on tcp connections. anyways if anyone has a l2Jserver already running , has configured it correctly so i can connect to it and it is for testing purposes , i am offered to find the exploits available to actually gain control over the server and to any server until it gets patched , i'm really furstrated i spent the whole day trying to crack a mysql but the server i want to hack is owned by an IT company and he has secured it well the only thing left is to try a bruteforcer like hydra .. but i think that there are payloads that can be landed on the victim machine. If only an early version of XAMPP was used.. THIS COMPLETELY SUCKS BIGTIME IM GONNA CRACK A NOOB BOX NOW !just kidding.. Im gonna have to agree :( this does not work anymore and is an old method like POD or maybe it is POD. POD = Ping of Death. PS: Servers now have flood protection for packets from hlapex and phx to network flooding attacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathdemo Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 1st way i thought was with "zombie computers" this method always works but requires a lot of planning like distributing the trojan e.t.c. else is with malformed headers e.t.c. and requires network architecture knowledge.. i remember darkmindz.com had a nice flooder that was written in php language , is this one is in vb ? who will let me test his l2server ? i will report to him the vulnerabilities and not actually hack it.. last server i tried to exploit was using xampp but was ubersecured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deathdemo Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 has anyone tried using wireshark instead of l2phx? i would test it myself but i can't run lineage when im on linux :P bruteforce is sloooooooow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neptun444 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 dont double post just edit your post with the bottom in the right side of the screen ,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drogata Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i think that is good and i will test now tnx for share dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xDunno Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Awesom staff thx for it =] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 has anyone tried using wireshark instead of l2phx? i would test it myself but i can't run lineage when im on linux :P bruteforce is sloooooooow! I have tried wireshark with no luck :/ , anyway wireshark is like general software and its not as specialized as phx is. PS: The packets you get from wireshark are many and you have to identify the ones for l2. Awesom staff thx for it =] Have you even tried it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xDunno Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 y i did it sending pack'ets but it dont lag dont crashed srv dunno why ;/ maybe b/c tthere is 2 servers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts