Jump to content
  • 0

Lag When Opening Inventory..


Question

Posted

Hello,
I am currently using Mobius 2.8 Seven Signs (Subscriber Version).
I have increased the inventory capacity from 80 slots to 500 slots.
The problem is that when the number of items exceeds 200, opening the inventory causes a delay of about 1–2 seconds.
If the inventory is empty or contains only a small number of items, there is no lag at all, but when the item count goes over 200 or 300, the delay increases accordingly.

 

Is there anyone who could fix this issue?

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

i think it's the auto sorting of the interface that sucks, check InventoryWnd script in interface.u, or completely disable the request item list packet when toggling the inventory window (also in InventoryWnd script or similar name)

  • 0
Posted

1. Optimize Packet Serialization

  • Look in ItemList.java or wherever the inventory packet is constructed.

  • Instead of building the packet with inefficient string concatenation or repeated allocations, use a preallocated buffer and avoid creating new objects for each item.

  • Mobius sources are Java-based, so profiling with something like VisualVM or YourKit can help see where most time is spent.

2. Avoid Sending the Full List Each Time

  • Modify the server to send only changed items (diff packets) when the inventory window opens.

  • Some newer forks implement this as “lazy loading” or paged inventory so the client only loads e.g. 100 items at a time.

3. Limit the Inventory Size Per Page

  • Instead of showing all 500 slots at once, split the inventory into pages/tabs (100 slots each).

  • When the user switches a tab, send only that page’s items.

  • This requires some client-side editing, but it’s the most user-friendly long-term fix.

4. Database & Cache Optimizations

  • Ensure your items table is indexed by owner_id to make the query for player items fast.

  • Cache item templates and static data so they are not reloaded every time the inventory is shown.


⚠️ Things to Keep in Mind

  • Increasing slots from 80 → 500 does not just change a number — it multiplies the workload for packet building and UI rendering.

  • You can’t fully avoid some extra cost with 500 items, but you can keep it under a few milliseconds if you optimize how and when the data is sent.


 

 

  • 0
Posted

1. You where subscriber 3 years ago.
2. There is no current L2jMobius 2.8 Seven Signs version. Subcriber or not.

3. You have your answer from multiple forums that more items is more delay.

 

  • 0
Posted (edited)
On 9/16/2025 at 2:37 AM, borinet said:

Hello,
I am currently using Mobius 2.8 Seven Signs (Subscriber Version).
I have increased the inventory capacity from 80 slots to 500 slots.
The problem is that when the number of items exceeds 200, opening the inventory causes a delay of about 1–2 seconds.
If the inventory is empty or contains only a small number of items, there is no lag at all, but when the item count goes over 200 or 300, the delay increases accordingly.

 

Is there anyone who could fix this issue?

 

Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types.

 

If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance.

 

Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent.

Edited by Tryskell

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Thank you very much. It would also be good if you looked into this issue. UnknownSoldier has been manipulating me to make me look bad. He deleted all the evidence I uploaded and left all the insults against me. You'll also see that on April 26th, he reopened the thread and then locked it again just so his friend from Argentina could post: links down :l XD   In the thread: https://maxcheaters.com/topic/253997-sourceservercliente-l2devs-files-l2devscom/page/2/ They do this so they can later tell people that I deleted the links because it was a lie, and so on. Realize that all the damage you're causing is related to this same person. Regards and thank you very much! 🙂 PS: I would like UnknownSoldier to publish the evidence for why he has repeatedly called me a SCAMMER and explain why he also says that to other people. This person is using forum privileges to smear and discredit those who don't work with him. I WANT ALL THE EVIDENCE OF WHAT HE'S SAYING.  
    • Theres a lot of drama going on about Guytis scamming people. I want real, solid proof showing that he scammed anyone attach everything you have.   About reputation: we’re all adults here, yet some are acting like kids fighting over pixels. Think before spreading rumors. False claims don’t make you look better they make you look worse.   I’m waiting for actual evidence that he scammed any user. If there’s nothing to back it up, I’ll deal with it myself. Time’s running out this has been going on long enough.
    • I’ve read the whole topic about Baylee and Protojah. From what I can see, Baylee wanted to buy some htmls and they agreed on a price. Later, Baylee changed her mind and decided not to go through with it. The product wasn’t delivered because Baylee changed her mind. Even if she initially agreed to the price, to avoid confusion. if the files had been sent and payment not made, I would call it a scam. But since they weren’t sent, this isn’t a scam.   I want to stress that I try to be fair to everyone, no matter the situation.   Yeah, Protojah did put in time and effort, and that’s fine, but disagreements happen all the time, even in real life jobs, no matter what the work is. I’m going to lock this topic to avoid more drama. Please keep all personal issues in private messages. And before anyone says anything else I’m not taking sides. I don’t protect scammers and I ban them, but since this isn’t a scam, you both should resolve this situation in DMs.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..