Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can you tell me if this machine can handle more than 300 players online? 

Intel Xeon E5-1630v3
2 Cores
230 GB Disk Space
8 GB RAM
UL TB Bandwidth
1 Gbps connection @200mbps
500 Gbps L3/4 DDoS Protection
Windows 2008/2012 R2 available

The only thing I am afraid is about the 2 cores and not 4. But please answer. 

project : acis(if it matters)

Posted (edited)

Processor doesn't have that much impact, it's single thread. Correct me if I'm wrong :)

Edited by SweeTs
Posted

Processor doesn't have that much impact, it's single thread. Correct me if I'm wrong :)

 

L2J isn't single threaded

Posted

Processor doesn't have that much impact, it's single thread. Correct me if I'm wrong :)

It actually does.

Processor is what really gets stressed with L2j, and that's mainly because of the Threadpool and the tasks.

Posted (edited)

As xdem mentioned server is not single-core handled. You should pay attention more in HD. Better give attention on buying an SSD and a high-ghz processor than ram and more cores.

Mostly because its using threadpool that stress CPU and it does lots of writes on database (which need fast load and read speed)

Edited by Solid State Drive
Posted

2 cores are enough for l2j. I used to have an athlon 2 core server with hetzner and 500 players were no issue. CPU usage was barely 40% during massive tvt event (200 players)

Posted

Most people forget than L2J was developed on another architectural computer time, and there were already no problem. Nowadays with improved hardware + improved pack writting style (and Java self-improvements, notably whatever concurrent related), you can figure by yourself it can be only "better" than "worst".

 

And tasks can be mutualized in a lot of cases.

Posted

Still, as TK mentioned, teen years back ppl was OK with worse specs :D

Tryskell has a teen-dwarf as photo, who would trust his words anyway? I'm sure he spends his time searching for "how to programming 3d girls and make them real"  ^-^

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock