Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello, our studio DeDs is engaged in the production of promotional videos, intro, 3d animation/visualization/modeling/banners.

 
Work experience: 11+ years
More than 600 satisfied customers.
Qualitatively, cheaply and in a short time
Programs: Adobe After Effects, Maxon Cinema 4d, Realflow, Adobe Photoshop, CorelDraw.
 
 
Prices:
Standart promo video 30-60 sec: 40-70$.
Premium: 80-150$
Cinematic: from 4 to 6$ per sec
 
Contacts:
e-mail: devaltor@gmail.com
Telegram: @DoubleX_DevalTOR
Discord: doublexshow
skype: devaltords
Edited by devaltor
  • Upvote 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
 
3 new promo videos for sale. Unique design. Video/images in promo, text, music, etc. can be changed.
 
Contact Information:
icq: 499 102 598
skype: devaltords
e-mail: devaltor@gmail.com
or here.
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

So basically you download all free templates from sharae and youtube and you sell them here? 

If you deny this i'll simply laugh for 3.5 hours. 

Not always, even if I work with them, I take 3-4 templates and modify them to make a unique product. In addition, in non-budget projects I work with 3d (in cinema 4d) to create a scene, text, or full animation

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/31/2017 at 10:55 PM, Θα Σπασω Κουπες said:

So basically you download all free templates from sharae and youtube and you sell them here? 

If you deny this i'll simply laugh for 3.5 hours. 

You pay $40 and expect to have fully unique, never seen video with lots of SFX and VFX, in 4K and with advertisement included? :)
For startup projects this is perfect.

devaltor, I am still waiting for you at Skype :)

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..