Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello.

 

This is a PvP protection system I made a while ago (1-2 years ago).

 

Basically what it is: If a player kills someone 4 consecutive times in a row without 10 seconds passing between each kill, a protection from the killer to the victim is added which means for the next 15 minutes, the killer will not get any rewards from killing the victim (rewards like pvp point and maybe other customs addons you have like on-kill reward). There are also checks for same clan, same ally and same ip. GMs are excluded from the protection.

 

If you find any issues reply here and I will fix them. There are NO CONFIGS, everything is hardcoded but it's basically 3 numbers that you can change on the code.

 

Ignore the l2spike package on PvpProtection class, add it anywhere and change it.

 

I know it can be improved to avoid many tasks, I will do it soon and update the topic.

 

http://pastebin.com/B9W2neb1

 

Use this one (avoid having many tasks by checking the time of each kill): http://pastebin.com/JD1igS6t

 

Also, in L2PcInstance, find setPvpKills(getPvpKills()+1) and ABOVE it add:

		if (PvpProtection.getInstance().protectionExists(this, targetPlayer))
		{
			sendMessage("You did not get any rewards from this kill.");
			return;
		}
		PvpProtection.getInstance().checkKill(this, targetPlayer);

And in GameServer add:

PvpProtection.getInstance();

It was coded on aCis (can't remember revision).

Edited by An4rchy
Posted (edited)

Don't forget AoE

This system checks player -> player kills, so aoe would still count. (since the player using AoE is killing another player, I mean same methods are called to update pvp kills)

Edited by An4rchy
Posted

Similar to your AuctionManager, probably end with ConcurrentException, both on maps and lists. Not sure about int integrity on kills aswell - notably on AoE kills (AtomicInteger is probably a better choice).

Posted (edited)

Similar to your AuctionManager, probably end with ConcurrentException, both on maps and lists. Not sure about int integrity on kills aswell - notably on AoE kills (AtomicInteger is probably a better choice).

I've tested similar systems (map accessed by many players, looped through etc) and never had a ConcurrentException before. Probably because it's too fast or I'm too lucky.

Anyway updated.

Edited by An4rchy
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)
    public void addNewProtection(Player killer, Player victim, KillStats ks)
    {
        killStats.remove(ks);
       
  ->      if (protections.containsKey(victim))
  ->         protections.get(victim).add(killer.getObjectId());
        else
        {

on these that i marked i get this warning  : Unlikely argument type Player for containsKey(Object) on a Map<Integer,List<Integer>>

 

what causing this ? i did compile and tested and wasnt working ...

**do we have any other code that protects pvp with hwid ip ?

 

i use 370 acis rev

Edited by Xenokage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Luniage - a custom Interlude client on Unity, with its own server Hi everyone. I've been quietly working on this for a long time and I think it's finally at the point where it's worth showing. Short version: it's Interlude, but the client and the server are both mine. The client is a custom one, built in Unity — not a patched or reskinned original. The server is written from scratch in C#. The only thing that comes from the old game is the content: the world, the models, the animations, the sounds, the icons, the interface art. The game looks and feels like the game you know. Everything underneath it is new. Why do this at all   Because the old client is a 2004 executable and anyone who has ever tried to add something to it knows exactly how that conversation ends. You can't add a window. You can't change how a skill looks. You can't fix a bug that's staring you in the face. Every server that wanted a feature of its own had to fake it through HTML dialogs and system messages, because the client simply won't bend. At some point it stops being worth fighting. I'd rather keep the game and rebuild everything around it. Where it is right now   You can sit down and play it. Not a tech demo, not a walk-around-and-look-at-the-trees build - an actual character. Most of the game is in: movement, combat, the skill system with its real formulas and timings, items and equipment, enchanting, shops and player trade, quests, parties, clans, and the whole interface that ties it together. Progression works from level 1 all the way through A grade - you can level, gear up, join a clan and run content today. What's missing isn't the foundation. It's the top end - and that's exactly where the work is pointed next.   Videos     What I'm working on now   Castle sieges and the Olympiad. The two biggest systems the game has, the ones that turn a working world into a server people actually stay on. And visual effects. They already run, but "runs" and "looks the way you remember it" are two very different things, and closing that gap turned out to be a much longer road than I expected. I'm going through them one by one. Does it run outside Windows   Yes. It's a Unity project, so Windows, Mac and Linux are just build targets. I actually develop on a Mac, which has kept the whole thing honest about staying portable. Will it work with my existing server   No, and it never will. The client talks to my server and nothing else - that's the trade I made, and it's the reason everything above is possible in the first place. If you're looking for a drop-in replacement client for a setup you already have, this isn't it. What's the goal   First and foremost, to launch my own project on it. That's what the client and the server are being built for, and that's what sets the priorities. Longer term, I'd like to open-source it. This community has spent twenty years working around a client nobody can touch, and I think the honest ending to this story is handing over something people can actually build on. I'm not putting a date on that - first it has to be good enough to be worth someone else's time. Can I try it   Not yet. When there's a build worth handing out, it gets posted here first. In the meantime I'll be posting progress regularly, and I read every reply. If you've run a server, built a client, or just spent a decade staring at this game and know exactly which detail everyone gets wrong — please say so. A good share of what's right in this project is right because somebody pointed at a screenshot and said "that's not how it looked." Thanks for reading.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..