Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello.

 

This is a PvP protection system I made a while ago (1-2 years ago).

 

Basically what it is: If a player kills someone 4 consecutive times in a row without 10 seconds passing between each kill, a protection from the killer to the victim is added which means for the next 15 minutes, the killer will not get any rewards from killing the victim (rewards like pvp point and maybe other customs addons you have like on-kill reward). There are also checks for same clan, same ally and same ip. GMs are excluded from the protection.

 

If you find any issues reply here and I will fix them. There are NO CONFIGS, everything is hardcoded but it's basically 3 numbers that you can change on the code.

 

Ignore the l2spike package on PvpProtection class, add it anywhere and change it.

 

I know it can be improved to avoid many tasks, I will do it soon and update the topic.

 

http://pastebin.com/B9W2neb1

 

Use this one (avoid having many tasks by checking the time of each kill): http://pastebin.com/JD1igS6t

 

Also, in L2PcInstance, find setPvpKills(getPvpKills()+1) and ABOVE it add:

		if (PvpProtection.getInstance().protectionExists(this, targetPlayer))
		{
			sendMessage("You did not get any rewards from this kill.");
			return;
		}
		PvpProtection.getInstance().checkKill(this, targetPlayer);

And in GameServer add:

PvpProtection.getInstance();

It was coded on aCis (can't remember revision).

Edited by An4rchy
Posted (edited)

Don't forget AoE

This system checks player -> player kills, so aoe would still count. (since the player using AoE is killing another player, I mean same methods are called to update pvp kills)

Edited by An4rchy
Posted

Similar to your AuctionManager, probably end with ConcurrentException, both on maps and lists. Not sure about int integrity on kills aswell - notably on AoE kills (AtomicInteger is probably a better choice).

Posted (edited)

Similar to your AuctionManager, probably end with ConcurrentException, both on maps and lists. Not sure about int integrity on kills aswell - notably on AoE kills (AtomicInteger is probably a better choice).

I've tested similar systems (map accessed by many players, looped through etc) and never had a ConcurrentException before. Probably because it's too fast or I'm too lucky.

Anyway updated.

Edited by An4rchy
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)
    public void addNewProtection(Player killer, Player victim, KillStats ks)
    {
        killStats.remove(ks);
       
  ->      if (protections.containsKey(victim))
  ->         protections.get(victim).add(killer.getObjectId());
        else
        {

on these that i marked i get this warning  : Unlikely argument type Player for containsKey(Object) on a Map<Integer,List<Integer>>

 

what causing this ? i did compile and tested and wasnt working ...

**do we have any other code that protects pvp with hwid ip ?

 

i use 370 acis rev

Edited by Xenokage

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • I'll give you my wallet if you want, haha
    • To make up for some of the waiting time we’re hosting a 3v3 Tournament on open Beta, and this time we’re raising the stakes with a $1,300 prize pool 💰   🏆 PRIZE POOL BREAKDOWN (Over 2000$ Worth of prices total)   🥇 1st Place — $700 🥈 2nd Place —$300 🥉 3rd Place — $200 🏅 4th Place — $100  5th -6th Place - $100 in Gold Coins each    All Participating Teams: $50 in Gold!   All Prices will be Paid out instantly after the tour, no waiting time and conditions. This is not simply a marketing move, we want to give back to the community.   📅 Date: Wednesday 06.05.2026 ⏰ Time: 20:00 Central European Timezone (Berlin) 📍Format: 3v3   ⚔️Why join? Cash Prices for top 4 and rewards for all participants Payments to winners sent out straight after the tournament - No waiting time or rules that you have to play live server to obtain the reward. Clean format, smooth matches, and solid prize pool and a chance to experience our brand new files   📝How to join: Form your 3-player team Group Leader Sign up here: ⁠📍・3v3-tour-registration (Include Name of Group, Name of Group Leader)   Be ready on match day!     A separate post with rules for the tournament and class setups will follow shortly.   Tag your teammates, lock in your roster, and get ready to compete. We'll be happy to see you on the OBT!   💬 Questions? Ask in ⁠🎫・ticket or send us a message   See you on L2Dark! 😏   Discord: https://discord.gg/FAJwnFpb8M
    • You should check if that condition is supported by your current sources. You can find this in  DocumentBase#parsePlayerCondition If it isnt there and you want to follow the same pattern of the other item conditions, create a custom condition to parse the classId (or multiple class ids) (there are examples to copy the code). Alternatively, you can create your own condition handler. Your condition should look like this: <cond msgId="1518"> <player classId="ADVENTURER,PALADIN" /> </cond> or <cond msgId="1518"> <player classId="93,5" /> </cond>  
    • it's Interlude client forgot to mention
    • idk if acis have this option, but you can put inside item smth like that atleast on H5         <cond msgId="1518">             <player class_id_restriction="93, 101, 108, 117" /> <!-- Dagger Masters -->         </cond>
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..