Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Major announcement

 

Windex updated the project from .NET Framework to .NET Core 2.0.

This means that you can now also run it on Linux and Mac.

This also opens a door for a lot of other improvements.

 

Take a look a leave a star at https://github.com/Elfocrash/L2dotNET

  • Like 1
  • 5 years later...
Posted

And yet here we are (future) what happens with the project? I've been grown to love lineage and java is something i can't even imagine coding at. I'd love C# and golang, so what's going on with it? I am really curious cuz so you said yourself you ain't abandon a project such as that, but that's a huge project to carry for one or two people. At least what happen? Is it complete? If it is i surely wanna see dot net core 8.0 on, of course it would need upgrade and migration and most of it change the entire think to the modern C#. I really want to see how would it be with rabbitmq and redis, of course rabbitmq in very specific cases and really curious if i can make it cloud friendly project i really am curious.

I know it's an old topic years ago but if someone knows anything it would be perfect.

Posted

Elfo never followed its own L2J projects for more than 3 consecutives months and will never do so. That's like a running gag or a prophecy you can't go through, like aCis being a never-ending project.

 

For his defense, he got way better things to do and is far more successful on his Youtube channel. Also, anyone is up to pick what Elfo left ; don't be that sort of ppl requesting fully functional code.

 

The GIT is still functional so you can follow his path.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tryskell said:

Elfo never followed its own L2J projects for more than 3 consecutives months and will never do so. That's like a running gag or a prophecy you can't go through, like aCis being a never-ending project.

 

For his defense, he got way better things to do and is far more successful on his Youtube channel. Also, anyone is up to pick what Elfo left ; don't be that sort of ppl requesting fully functional code.

 

The GIT is still functional so you can follow his path.

 

I love that every comment you write must include aCis. I can imagine you with your new girl the very first night in a romantic hotel room. 

 

-Girl: Wanna join in this hot tub with me babe?

-Tryskell: I would highly recommend join my inner aCis circle first then your tab.

-Girl: I'm from L2J team.

-Tryskell: ...please out of my room. 

Posted
On 12/19/2023 at 3:47 PM, Tryskell said:

Elfo never followed its own L2J projects for more than 3 consecutives months and will never do so. That's like a running gag or a prophecy you can't go through, like aCis being a never-ending project.

 

For his defense, he got way better things to do and is far more successful on his Youtube channel. Also, anyone is up to pick what Elfo left ; don't be that sort of ppl requesting fully functional code.

 

The GIT is still functional so you can follow his path.

I do not expect anything, i've started the project myself from the scratch, not that the code isn't good, i just don't like to copy/paste thinks up. I need clean space doing thinks my way, but i'm still thinking on deciding, will it really be C#? or will it be golang? cuz i don't know i really really love golang, however c# on the other hand it's really improved. I've started the project  in C# but still i am frozen and still undecided if i'd rather continue in C# or switch (cuz now it's early) when it's going to be huge that's a hell of a problem).

On 12/19/2023 at 5:41 PM, Kara_ said:

 

I love that every comment you write must include aCis. I can imagine you with your new girl the very first night in a romantic hotel room. 

 

-Girl: Wanna join in this hot tub with me babe?

-Tryskell: I would highly recommend join my inner aCis circle first then your tab.

-Girl: I'm from L2J team.

-Tryskell: ...please out of my room. 

Well he've done hard work, i don't know if he has a team but ppl say it's a very good pack source, i didn't see the code and structure but if the people are satisfied i guess he did a great job, so he just wants to advertise his hard work, so why not? But regardless i hate Java so i would NEVER ever touch Java code. 

Posted
On 12/23/2023 at 11:11 PM, Anonymity said:

I do not expect anything, i've started the project myself from the scratch, not that the code isn't good, i just don't like to copy/paste thinks up. I need clean space doing thinks my way, but i'm still thinking on deciding, will it really be C#? or will it be golang? cuz i don't know i really really love golang, however c# on the other hand it's really improved. I've started the project  in C# but still i am frozen and still undecided if i'd rather continue in C# or switch (cuz now it's early) when it's going to be huge that's a hell of a problem).

Well he've done hard work, i don't know if he has a team but ppl say it's a very good pack source, i didn't see the code and structure but if the people are satisfied i guess he did a great job, so he just wants to advertise his hard work, so why not? But regardless i hate Java so i would NEVER ever touch Java code. 

 

Ignore it me and tryskel have long past of spam attack each other since 2015 😞 

You're cleary new

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..